To: Campion
Ironically, part of what Luther did was to rediscover authentic Catholic tradition that had become obscured, not in the official teaching of the Church, but in the popular piety of the Catholics of his day. Unfortunately, he didn't stop there. If he had, we might today call him St. Martin of Wittenberg, Priest and Doctor. Coulda, woulda, shoulda. We could play those games too.
If Pope Leo X and Cardinal Cajetan hadn't excommunicated Luther, but recognized his 95 theses raised some valid objections, there wouldn't have been a Lutheran schism.
It's water under the bridge. What matters today is what you recongized - that Luther rediscovered what had been obscured, as you rightly observed, by the popular piety of the Catholic church.
41 posted on
11/14/2005 11:25:38 AM PST by
jude24
("Thy law is written on the hearts of men, which iniquity itself effaces not." - St. Augustine)
To: jude24
Interestingly, Leo only demanded that Luther retract 41 of the 95...
42 posted on
11/14/2005 11:32:23 AM PST by
jcb8199
To: jude24
What matters today is what you recongized - that Luther rediscovered what had been obscured, as you rightly observed, by the popular piety of the Catholic church. It was the popular piety of Luther's time I was speaking of, not that of today. Also, the philosophy of the day was decrepit, and that infected the theology.
You're right that both sides did a poor job of communicating, though. Leo X was not an evil Pope, but not a very competent one, either.
53 posted on
11/14/2005 2:26:46 PM PST by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson