You inaccurate and condescended reply was. ”Well ... er ... apparently, you didn't bother to read the post. In case you missed it ....”
No, sir/madam – the apocryphal writings remain errant and were added to your Bible as canon as stated. I do not accept your Roman Catholic apologist’s argument for them as valid.
Then you should be able to produce a Bible without the Deuterocanonical books dating between the Councils of Carthage (which listed them as canonical) and Trent.