Skip to comments.
Priest shortage stems from crisis of faith, ignorance of the infinite, not celibacy, say Bishops
Catholic New Agency ^
| Oct. 13, 2005
Posted on 10/14/2005 6:07:17 AM PDT by Petrosius
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
10/14/2005 6:07:18 AM PDT
by
Petrosius
To: Petrosius
Priest shortage stems from crisis of faith, ignorance of the infinite, not celibacy, say Bishops
Absolutely 100% true.
I am a personal witness to the upswing of vocations to the priesthood that is arising from this mess and it was all because of faith.
The fundamental call to the priesthood is death to self in service to others. When certain members of the Church - who shall remain nameless - only give homilies about how Jesus is just one big, cuddly teady-bear, who is going to die for that? BUT...when you have someone actually proclaim the Truth in its fullness, who proclaims unequivocally without a doubt that faith in Jesus Christ and His work through the Sacraments is necessary, men will willingly give their lives for that. The greatest number of seminarians we had from our parish occured when we had a wonderful Monsignor who told it like it is. A few people did not like being taken out of their comfort zones, complained to the Bishop, and had him moved to some podunk town. Since then, applicants to the seminary have decreased.
The priesthood shortage has NOTHING to do with celibacy.
2
posted on
10/14/2005 6:21:09 AM PDT
by
mike182d
("Other than than, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
To: mike182d
Agree. The problem is that the churches at the local level have done an absolutely abysmal job in teaching the faith as given from 2000 years ago. In their efforts to teach a "Gospel" that appeals to everyone, especially secular America, it has lost sight of the mystery and sovereignty that is God. WHY would anyone want to sacrifice all that becoming a priest entails for the watered-down version of garbage that we hear at many parishes in the US and Europe? Rather than being counter-cultural, the local churches have tried mightly in preaching an appealing gospel that Joe Smith can go to church on Sunday and do nothing else - no dying to self, no carrying the cross. By being changing the liturgy, our sense of awe and mystery is lost. By not teaching the faith, we don't even realize that we are ALL called to become disciples of Christ.
Is it a wonder there is a priest shortage???
Regards
3
posted on
10/14/2005 6:52:42 AM PDT
by
jo kus
To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
4
posted on
10/14/2005 6:58:31 AM PDT
by
NYer
(“Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
To: mike182d
"a lack of faith, secularization, and the closing of the window onto infinity."He forgot "poor witness on the part of an emasculated priesthood", "seminaries that wreak of homosexuality and modernist thinking", and the denial of any married man who may be called to the priesthood. None of this should be left out.
5
posted on
10/14/2005 8:00:42 AM PDT
by
ThomasMore
(Time to remove the Gays from the hierarchy!)
To: ThomasMore
and the denial of any married man who may be called to the priesthood.
I agree with everything you said in that last statement except for this line.
When Christ says to Peter "what you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and what you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven" means that the will of God and Christ works through the Church, not against it. If, by the authority of the Church as given to it by Christ, the Church decides not to allow married men in the priesthood, Christ isn't going to rebel against the Church's authority - thereby undermining it - and call married men to the priesthood. Christ would change the Church first.
6
posted on
10/14/2005 8:08:25 AM PDT
by
mike182d
("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
To: Petrosius; saradippity; NYer
The priest shortage stems from the goons and vipers we have had for bishops.
7
posted on
10/14/2005 8:26:52 AM PDT
by
Maeve
(O most merciful Christ, how shall I sing thee praise?)
To: mike182d
Christ isn't going to rebel against the Church's authority - thereby undermining it - and call married men to the priesthood.The Church already ordains married men. There has never been a period in time that it didn't. The Latin Rite has chosen MANDATORY celibacy. Your argument is based on a statement that pertains to faith and morals. Celibacy is a discipline. It is a great gift to those who can accept it and use it to build up the kingdom. But, nonetheless, a discipline.
8
posted on
10/14/2005 8:46:54 AM PDT
by
ThomasMore
(Time to remove the Gays from the hierarchy!)
To: Maeve
The priest shortage stems from the goons and vipers we have had for bishops.Add that to post 5 as well.
;^)
9
posted on
10/14/2005 8:48:28 AM PDT
by
ThomasMore
(Time to remove the Gays from the hierarchy!)
To: ThomasMore
The Church already ordains married men.
The Latin Rite of the Catholic Church has not "ordained" any married men, at least to my recollection. It does allow for Byzantine Rite priests to marry and if a married man was ordained in another tradition prior to conversion, the Church acknowledge his priestly status, but it doesn't ordain married people as priests.
Your argument is based on a statement that pertains to faith and morals. Celibacy is a discipline.
Yes, but a priest takes a vow of obedience which means that in order for any man to become priest in the Latin Rite, they must, by necessity, be competely obedient to the will of the Magesterium. This type of discline is not on the same level as, say, not eating fish on Friday's.
Christ, through the Church and the Church only, confers upon a man the office of priest. Thus, if Christ truly desired for married men to be priests in the Latin Rite, would He not first make changes to that through which He makes men priests in the first place?
I knew a girl who, through much prayer, thought at one time that she was being called to be ordained a priest. What's the best way to "test the spirits" of one's discernment? By what Christ allows through the Church - that is why He gave it to us, as a guide.
My point is that if Christ wanted married men in the Latin Rite to become priests, He would tell the Church before He told the would-be Seminarian. That's the whole reason we have a hierarchy to begin with.
10
posted on
10/14/2005 9:18:53 AM PDT
by
mike182d
("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
To: Maeve
Wolves in shepherd's clothing.
11
posted on
10/14/2005 9:28:39 AM PDT
by
nanetteclaret
(Our Lady's Hat Society)
To: mike182d
This is not entirely true. Priests of the Anglican Use, which is part of the Latin Rite, can be ordained if they had been Episcopal/Anglican priests before converting and go through the instruction process afterwards - even if they are married. The priest at my church is such an example.
12
posted on
10/14/2005 9:34:07 AM PDT
by
nanetteclaret
(Our Lady's Hat Society)
To: nanetteclaret
Priests of the Anglican Use, which is part of the Latin Rite, can be ordained if they had been Episcopal/Anglican priests before converting and go through the instruction process afterwards - even if they are married.
Operative words: "if they had been Episcopal/Anglican priests before converting."
According to the Church, these married priests were ordained prior to entering into the Latin Rite and therefore their ordination was not at the hands of the Latin Rite.
Today, the Latin Rite does not itself ordain married men.
13
posted on
10/14/2005 9:43:35 AM PDT
by
mike182d
("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
To: mike182d
No, my priest was ordained into the Roman Catholic church after he converted. He had to go through a period of study and a process, but he was re-ordained. Come to think of it, I know another former Episcopal priest, still married, who converted then was re-ordained into the Latin Rite, so it's not always into the Anglican Use. They all have to go through a process (application, study, etc.), then they are re-ordained.
14
posted on
10/14/2005 10:00:30 AM PDT
by
nanetteclaret
(Our Lady's Hat Society)
To: mike182d
P.S. Here is the church website:
http://www.stmarythevirgin.org/
Go to "About St. Marys" on the left, then click on "Bishop Delaney's decree establishing the parish." You will see the following near the end of the letter:
It is my intention that the Reverend Allen Hawkins, upon his ordination to the sacred priesthood, will be appointed the first pastor of the new parish.
Fr. Hawkins and the whole parish converted to the Roman Catholic Church, then he was ordained a Roman Catholic priest not too long afterwards (I think about three months later).
15
posted on
10/14/2005 10:13:05 AM PDT
by
nanetteclaret
(Our Lady's Hat Society)
To: Maeve
16
posted on
10/14/2005 10:18:20 AM PDT
by
Convert from ECUSA
(Not a nickel, not a dime, no more money for Hamastine!)
To: mike182d
The Latin Rite of the Catholic Church has not "ordained" any married men There are plenty of ex-lutheran and ex-anglican/episcopal men that are married and are priests in the Latin Rite. And yes, these have to be ordained because they have no valid orders.
priest takes a vow of obedience
I am a married Deacon who has taken the same vow of obedience. Not sure what this has to do with being married? It certainly doesn't ill effect either of my vocations.
I knew a girl who, through much prayer, thought at one time that she was being called to be ordained a priest.
Married men were in the Latin Rite since the beginning, absent for the last 1000 years but only in the Latin Rite. But women have never been, nor can they ever be ordained simply because the priest serves In Persona Christi and women are not men.
I know several married priests, either ex-lutheran or ex-anglican, and they are all superb priests, very loyal to the Magisterium. As protestants they were married and later ordained as ministers. Years later when they converted to Catholicism they were ordained to the priesthood through a dispensation. They had a call to the priesthood. Unfortunately the same doesn't hold true for a man raised in the Catholic faith in the Latin Rite.
When all is said and done, my friend, it is not marriage or celibacy that makes a good priest, but rather how the man's heart is configured to the Lord. I know too many good priests, both celibate and married, to say any different.
17
posted on
10/14/2005 10:44:01 AM PDT
by
ThomasMore
(Time to remove the Gays from the hierarchy!)
To: nanetteclaret
He had to go through a period of study and a process, but he was re-ordained.
There's really no such thing as "re-ordination." When a baptized Protestant wants to enter into the Church, they don't have to be "re-baptized" but still have to go through the same RCIA program as those who are. The process of catechesis for new members of the Church is not an "ordination" but rather an affirmation of the validity of his prior ordination, just as catechisis for a baptized Protestant isn't a re-baptism but an affirmation of the validity of his prior baptism.
I really think something is being "lost in translation" here and the Reverend is not being entirely clear with what actually happened.
I have not seen a married man from another faith, who was not a Protestant "priest" before conversion, have the office of priest conferred upon him within the Latin Rite. There really isn't anything in the rubrics allowing for such a thing - unless it was allowed by means of a special indult.
18
posted on
10/14/2005 11:08:17 AM PDT
by
mike182d
("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
To: nanetteclaret
Ah, right on the website is your answer:
A parish of the Pastoral Provision of Pope John Paul II for the Anglican Usage of the Roman Rite
The Church is not a "Latin Rite" Church. It is part of the Church of Rome, but provisionally under rules provided for "Anglican Usage."
19
posted on
10/14/2005 11:10:28 AM PDT
by
mike182d
("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
To: ThomasMore
There are plenty of ex-lutheran and ex-anglican/episcopal men that are married and are priests in the Latin Rite. And yes, these have to be ordained because they have no valid orders.
If a Protestant is married and was not assigned to a priestly office in their former denomination, then they cannot be ordained priests in the Latin Rite - although I'm sure there are some by indult. In this day and age, Rome doesn't seem to like being too "authoritative" on things.
I am a married Deacon who has taken the same vow of obedience. Not sure what this has to do with being married? It certainly doesn't ill effect either of my vocations.
The office of Deacon, while being ordained clergy, is not the same as the office of priest. Your vow of obedience made to Rome contains no stipulations regarding the celibacy of deacons.
Married men were in the Latin Rite since the beginning, absent for the last 1000 years but only in the Latin Rite. But women have never been, nor can they ever be ordained simply because the priest serves In Persona Christi and women are not men.
Celibate men were also in the Latin Rite from the beginning and was encouraged. It wasn't until later that it was made mandatory, but that does not mean Rome never supported the practice prior. It has always been in the Church.
I know several married priests, either ex-lutheran or ex-anglican, and they are all superb priests, very loyal to the Magisterium. As protestants they were married and later ordained as ministers. Years later when they converted to Catholicism they were ordained to the priesthood through a dispensation. They had a call to the priesthood. Unfortunately the same doesn't hold true for a man raised in the Catholic faith in the Latin Rite.
These men weren't being "re-ordained" any more than a Protestant coming into the Church has to be "re-baptised" - its more of a validation of their prior ordination. If they had not been ordained ministers prior to entering the Church, they could not be ordained in the Latin Rite. Except for maybe an indult as I mentioned earlier, but I am not aware of this happening.
When all is said and done, my friend, it is not marriage or celibacy that makes a good priest, but rather how the man's heart is configured to the Lord. I know too many good priests, both celibate and married, to say any different.
Rome does not issue disciplines arbitrarily. If they did, those would be "works of the Law" as condemned by Paul and forbidden to be followed. Rome opted to make mandatory the ancient practice of celibacy because it makes them better priests. Otherwise, they would have absolutely no reason to do it and such a discipline is meaningless. Can a married man be a good priest? Absolutely. Would celibacy make him a better priest? Absolutely.
20
posted on
10/14/2005 11:23:31 AM PDT
by
mike182d
("Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson