Your first paragraph is needless pap, since it's been obvious from the start I know more about church history than you. Why you have the need to focus on recent history and tell me where the modern married priests came from can only mean you're trying to salvage your ridiculous earlier comments by now posing as a historian.
Your last sentence can only be responded to by saying so what? It doesn't refute or negate my earlier comments about church history or your relying on Paul to make an arugment against centuries of church practice which were contrary to Paul's "opinion."
Your first paragraph is needless pap, since it's been obvious from the start I know more about church history than you. Actually, the only thing obvious to me is that you are an ignorant jerk. So, go on believing whatever you want, I'm done debating with an ignorant fool.