[gscc]

http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/1823-24.htm

[conservonator]

Oh, so you weren't really citing a book that you have access to, you're citing a web site that makes claims about a work that he only quotes from sparingly. I see.

You do know that a single priest doesn't constitute the Church and her teachings don't you?

[Campion]

http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/1823-24.htm

One of the more notorious anti-Catholic sites on the web, run by a venomously anti-Catholic Seventh-Day Adventist, Mike Scheifler.

You didn't look up the primary source, in fact, you've never seen the primary source. But we all know that Mike Scheifler wouldn't lie, because he hates Roman Catholics as much as you do, right?

[jo kus]

http://www.aloha.net/...

That's your source? A clip from a clip? How about the primary citations? What kind of scholarship is that? How do I even know these words compiled were actually said by the so-called priest? I personally would like to see the source and context so I can look at the quotes. As I showed earlier, it is quite easy to make someone say quite the opposite by dropping off a few key words, or adding them.

Like "we are saved by faith alone apart from the works of the law".

Completely changes the meaning of the Word of God, doesn't it?

Regards