Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Petrosius; Polycarp1; ninenot

You might find this from the Vatican website interesting and informative: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cclergy/documents/rc_con_cclergy_doc_01011993_ortodox_en.html


69 posted on 10/03/2005 6:00:10 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Kolokotronis
I read the statement and have no difficulty with it. I recognize that priestly celibacy is only a discipline and not dogmatic. I also understand that the Orthodox believe that they are following the original Apostolic tradition. The evidence in the East is at best inconclusive either way. In the West, however, there is clearer evidence of priestly celibacy at least as early as the Patristic period. In the West we equally believe that we are following the original Apostolic tradition.

My beef is not with the Orthodox but those in the West who, ignorant of the historical evidence, posit a late medieval invention for the practice and also allege that it was introduced for purely worldly reasons.

70 posted on 10/03/2005 6:13:21 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Kolokotronis

Interesting site.

My beef, as it were is not with celibacy per se but rather the understanding that it must be mandatory for all clergy.
In this I believe the Roman Church, in the legitimate interest of the purity of her ministers, has thrown out the baby with the bathwater so to speak and excluded faithful men for the puzzling reason of their desire for the Sacrament of Marriage.



82 posted on 10/04/2005 8:08:20 AM PDT by Polycarp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson