Actually, it is well documented fact. Being blind to history does not make it go away.
Than it should be an easy task to post an authoritative source.
If it were as well-documented as you say, then you would have supported your empty assertion with some evidence.
Basically, you're saying that we should take you as an undisputed authority without presenting your claim for evaluation.
Sorry, Charlie.
Your assertion is flat-out false.
If you think you can back it up, go ahead.
But until then, it's not documented at all.
Suggesting history relevant does not make history any less morally relative...
The Church decides -you submit... At this time the discipline is as it is -end of story...