[DallasMike]

Could it be possible that the ice cores are misinterpreted? When the 'Krakatoa's' (I can't spell it)volcano in south Asia erupted there was a dramatic drop in temperature and Europe and America record a summer with out a temperature over 50 degrees. Could that show a difference in the ice cores, a result of changes in environment?

It's possible with occasional events, though the Greenland ice cores show the same winter/summer cycle of water isotopes through ice ages as well as through warm periods. I could grant you a few Krakatoa-type ice layers being misinterpreted but there definitely were not 100,000 such events over the past 6,000 years.

[Rhadaghast]

Could it also be possible that over 6000 years a series of 'Global warming' cycles could also have happened? Evolution is very dependent on a stasis of environment. With out that consistency there data is irrelevant due to the interpretation that is put on that data. Did you see the very scientific explanation of coal being made in 6 years or even 6 months with an event like Mt. St. Helen's? Your data has a plausible opposing interpretation that you are not considering.
,
Also:
Jesus believed in a six day creation, by honoring, and continuing the authenticity of; The Pentateuch, Moses, Adam and Eve, Noah, and dietary laws. These statements of support do not allow for a slight over sight of that "6 day creation myth".

Jesus said nothing about steeling, or homosexuality. Why? Because his silence was also a support of the continuation of the accepted societal norms established in Old Testament Revelation.