To: ahadams2; Fractal Trader; Zero Sum; anselmcantuar; Agrarian; coffeecup; Paridel; keilimon; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Humor:
The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
09/06/2005 5:08:58 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || (To Libs:) You are failing to celebrate MY diversity! || Iran Azadi)
To: sionnsar
My hat's off to you if you actually read this mess. I found myself drifting off somewhere around the part where the author claimed being faithful Christians means being heretics.
The stuff about pragmatism looked like it was plagiarized from a sophomore's essay for a philosophy 202 course.
3 posted on
09/06/2005 6:39:35 PM PDT by
Martin Tell
(Red States [should act like they] Rule)
To: sionnsar
I think that this commentary was slightly longer than the original TSOH document!
"History, however, is not meaningless to TSOH. Rather, it is a "movement", one drawn by the Holy Spirit. But as a collection of contestable apprehensions, history's positive movement can only be defined in terms of the progress of partial insights that emerge from these contested encounters."
Typical neoMarxist historicism!
5 posted on
09/06/2005 9:16:38 PM PDT by
Huber
(All we are saying...is give fleas to France)
To: sionnsar
Thanks for posting this. It gives a somewhat different angle on an issue I've been puzzling over, the relation between ordinary human ways of coming to understand things, revelation, and religious authority. Since Radner rejects an indefectible church though I don't think he's able to escape the problems he describes. (FWIW,
I agree with the Catholic
extra ecclesiam nulla salus.)
6 posted on
09/07/2005 4:40:56 AM PDT by
JimKalb
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson