Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Gerard.P
No. That's just the spin machine from the Neo Catholics who are going nuts at the thought of the SSPX getting respect from a Pope. And it's also funny how suddenly there is a "SSPX Mainstream" it's the liberal idea of sowing discord.

Actually, several SSPX supporters have told me that they have serious reservations about Williamson. Honestly. They've also told me that his move to Argentina was definitely not a promotion.

So I doubt he's going to be your next Superior.

Disunity must be something of a concern for those associating with SSPX, however. It's not beyond the realms of possibility that at some future date the society's bishops may disagree on regularizing its situation with Rome and go in opposite directions. That poses a real dilemma for yourself. Williamson's public letter was not directed at Rome. It was directed at the SSPX leadership and his own supporters within SSPX. It was a rallying cry and a warning to Fellay to keep at arms length. Photo ops in Fatima can't disguise this breach.

Williamson is brilliant, charitable and saintly. Hopefully the situation will be resolved and Williamson will be available papabile for the next conclave.

Not really. Williamson's problem is not intellect. It's basic common sense and humility. His writings certainly betray a lack of charity also. He's also a confirmed conspiracy theorist which usually indicates a poor feeling for the truth and a tenuous grip on reality.

It's highly unlikely at this stage that he will ever be in communion with Rome, absent some miracle of grace, still less a participant in a conclave.

65 posted on 08/30/2005 5:57:17 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: marshmallow

Actually, several SSPX supporters have told me that they have serious reservations about Williamson. Honestly.

It's only natural that there will be people with differing opinions. Just like the neos that believe it would be a mistake for Pope B16 to treat the SSPX with respect.

They've also told me that his move to Argentina was definitely not a promotion.

And how do they know? As I've shown, it can't possibly be a punishment because he hasn't been punished and has been traveling the world as he always has.

So I doubt he's going to be your next Superior.Disunity must be something of a concern for those associating with SSPX, however.

It's more of a hope on the part of the Neo Catholics.

It's not beyond the realms of possibility that at some future date the society's bishops may disagree on regularizing its situation with Rome and go in opposite directions.

Or that could be part of the plan. Why give Rome the whole pie in one shot? Why not let them prove themselves with a partial gain? You don't send all of your troops into battle and leave none for defense.

That poses a real dilemma for yourself. Williamson's public letter was not directed at Rome.

Yes it was. That's why Rome had to make the meeting public knowledge.

It was directed at the SSPX leadership and his own supporters within SSPX.

Only as a sounding board. It reads fine in either case though. It's intrinsically a good, wise and prudent letter.

It was a rallying cry and a warning to Fellay to keep at arms length.

No. It told the Vatican that Fellay is not there to give up the fight. Fellay's comments after the meeting show this as well.

Photo ops in Fatima can't disguise this breach.

Calling persecution at Fatima by evil-doers a photo op doesn't make it so.

Williamson's problem is not intellect. It's basic common sense and humility.

Actually his common sense is one of his most refreshing qualities. As far as humility goes, he's devoted himself entirely to God and the preservation of the RCC. He has accepted the cruelty and abuse with charity and never defends himself personally.

His writings certainly betray a lack of charity also.

They same could be said of St. Paul when they are taken out of context. Of course you have to know what "charity" really is. Sometimes it's tough love in order to make people see the truth. There can be no higher form of charity than defending the Catholic Church and showing someone

He's also a confirmed conspiracy theorist which usually indicates a poor feeling for the truth and a tenuous grip on reality.

Not really. It means that Williamson is aware of power struggles and can cut through "spin" and "propaganda" and see the reality for what it is. An example of naive Americans would be the ones who bought into the "Uncle Joe" Stalin image during WWII. Or currently terrorists "hijacking Islam- a religion of "peace"

It's highly unlikely at this stage that he will ever be in communion with Rome, absent some miracle of grace, still less a participant in a conclave.

He actually is in communion with Rome that's just more spin. No one ever thought John XXIII would be Pope either.

68 posted on 08/30/2005 7:01:20 AM PDT by Gerard.P (The lips of liberals drip with honey while their hands drip with blood--Bishop Williamson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson