To: jude24
A fact is a fact no matter the source.
The difficulty is in determining fact from assumption from opinion.
Therefore, Hillary Clinton speaking factually or WND speaking factually should cause all to register the facts spoken despite the source.
278 posted on
08/25/2005 4:35:19 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
If you noticed the article mentioned Judicial Watch,and yes Judicial Watch is responsible for bringing out the Able Danger research on Mohamed Atta before 911 happened.
Is Judicial Watch not credible?
280 posted on
08/25/2005 4:50:18 PM PDT by
pro610
(Faith the size of a mustard seed can move mountains.Praise Jesus Christ!)
To: xzins
A fact is a fact no matter the source. Not when WND has lied repeatedly, and is blinded by their ideology.
285 posted on
08/25/2005 5:58:03 PM PDT by
jude24
("Stupid" isn't illegal - but it should be.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson