Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

In fact, in 1 century only "petras" was used. "Lithos" (or is it "lythos") belongs to classical Greek.

More importantly, if Christ wanted to contrast the smallness of Peter with the solidity of some other rock nearby, he would not follow up by giving that "pebble" the keys to the Kingdom. Nor would Christ respond to a profession of faith with an insult. Nor would He repeat the commission following His resurrection in the "feed my sheep" verse.


133 posted on 08/15/2005 2:24:28 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
More importantly, if Christ wanted to contrast the smallness of Peter with the solidity of some other rock nearby, he would not follow up by giving that "pebble" the keys to the Kingdom. Nor would Christ respond to a profession of faith with an insult. Nor would He repeat the commission following His resurrection in the "feed my sheep" verse.

And most importantly, Christ, who could foresee the future, would not have made such a critical error that could possibly be misinterpreted. If we are to believe that Christ's message was clear and undeniable, then the proclamations he made to Peter MUST mean exactly what they say.

137 posted on 08/15/2005 2:31:50 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson