To: sionnsar
Well, in ages past, weren't church lands ["temporalities"] held from the King, with corresponding obligations like knight service and the like [today these would be called taxes]? Thus there have been ample precedents for church property accounting to the secular authorities, and bishop's objections [for which there are precedents, too] lack merit.
2 posted on
08/11/2005 5:00:43 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: GSlob
Well, in ages past, weren't church lands ["temporalities"] held from the King, with corresponding obligations like knight service and the like [today these would be called taxes]? Thus there have been ample precedents for church property accounting to the secular authorities, and bishop's objections [for which there are precedents, too] lack merit. Now that you mention it, that does make a certain kind of sense. Just think of the government as the King and the rest of us as serfs.
3 posted on
08/11/2005 5:20:40 PM PDT by
Logophile
To: GSlob
Worse yet, Mass. was founded by a bunch a puritan catholics, who forced everyone in the colony to tithe. Rmember the scarlet "A"?
Tom Dudley was my g16grandfather, BTW.
4 posted on
08/11/2005 5:26:39 PM PDT by
patton
("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson