[sitetest]

Dear Hermann the Cherusker,

Perhaps Mershon just misread it because he skimmed through it quickly.

I think it's reasonable to give Mershon the benefit of the doubt, so that he may apologize for his misunderstanding, and apologize to all those he's wrongly accused of "spreading errror" or "bashing the father of ten," etc., as a result of his apparent error.

What do you think?


sitetest

[Hermann the Cherusker]

Benefit of the doubt may only be granted if the error is realized within 50 posts and 5 responses of posting it.

[bornacatholic]

That is why I posted earlier he has a habit of making these errors due to poor reading comprehension. Frankly, I just am going to ignore him as the pattern of his nasty posting is both long and public and he has publicly insulted and castigated brilliant and successful apologists while he himself has made egregious errors which, despite having them pointed out to him, he never corrects or apoligizes for.

I ping him only because I mentioned his name. I have no desire to have any exchange with him. Our previous exchanges, both public and his freepmails to me, have been fruitless and frustrating due to his nastiness, false accusations, errors, arrogance, and attitude.