Replies

I have heard about this "Protocol". But Protocol or not- ARE YOU GOING TO DENY THERE ARE NOT ZIONISTS PRESENT-ESPECIALLY TODAY? HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEWS WITH THE ZIONISTS THRETENING TO KILL THE ISRAELI SOLDIERS IF THEY ARE REMOVED FROM THE WEST BANK? WAS IT NOT THE ZIONISTS WHO WERE THE ORIGINAL "TERRORISTS" AFTER WWII, KILLING AND BLOWING UP THE BRITISH WHO WERE TRYING TO LEAVE PALESTINE IN SOME SORT OF A SEMBLANCE OF A DEMOCRACY-BUT WERE KILLED AND MAIMED BY THE RADICAL JEWS IN THE 30'S AND 40'S?

You should really learn your history before tagging names and labels around, as is the usual liberal way of getting anyone who is "Conservative" to back down. The Democrats use the "Racist" label on Conservative Republicans-and lose every time, and now you have the Novus Ordo Catholics, who really cant debate the issue on merit as they have nothing of substance to fall back on, throwing the antisemitic label around.

I'll never deny there are Jews who are terrorists, and I'm not one of those people for whom the State of Israel can do no wrong.

I don't throw the antisemitic label around--I use it very sparingly to define those people who have a *particular* and pronounced disgust for Jews that they can't seem to muster for anyone else.

"Novus Ordo Catholics, who really cant debate the issue on merit as they have nothing of substance to fall back on, throwing the antisemitic label around."

Funny, well no it's not, but there does seem to be a lot of this name-calling going around whenever the liberals get nailed on the merits of an issue. They get away with it only because they take a moral weakness (whatever one works), in the conservative or traditional position and then pour some gasoline on it and point a blowtorch at it. Nobody is perfect. So why is it that the liberals, lacking none of it themselves, require moral perfection of their opponents?