Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wallcrawlr
Dont be a jackass with your condescending tone.

LOL. When I responded with the same tone that I perceived in your message to me, you resort to namecalling; I'm a "jackass"! Good one.

By the way, I enjoyed what your profile page says about graciousness.

I know what God ordains according to women pastors/leaders/positions of authority in the church.

However, you seem to have little or no problem if people choose to ignore it; it's just a matter of preference? Interesting. I'm always curious to know how some people decide something's a preference vs. a command.

I'm fully aware that I may burn in hell for believing what I do...I'm willing to take that chance.

Maybe you forgot a sarcasm tag there. Maybe not. Maybe it was meant to be condescending.

71 posted on 08/02/2005 1:58:40 PM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible, i.e. words mean things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: newgeezer

Well you assumed wrong and perceived incorrectly. We can call that an error of the internet and let it go.

That is graciousness with non-christians...and I am not some week Christian that lays over while my cheeks are slapped so welcome to my world.

Yes, that is a curious issue. People are different, Christians are different.

Also, that is not sarcasm and that is not condescending.


75 posted on 08/02/2005 2:04:32 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: newgeezer; wallcrawlr

C'mon, guys.


81 posted on 08/02/2005 2:14:03 PM PDT by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson