Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge asked to restore Cleveland's Bishop Pilla as defendant
http://www.cleveland.com/ ^ | July 26, 2005 | M.R. KROPKO

Posted on 07/26/2005 2:27:03 PM PDT by Knock3Times

Judge asked to restore Cleveland bishop as defendant

7/26/2005, 4:25 p.m. ET
M.R. KROPKO
The Associated Press
 

CLEVELAND (AP) — A lawyer on Tuesday asked a judge to restore Cleveland's Roman Catholic bishop as a defendant in a lawsuit as legal challenges and criticism against the bishop mount over his handling of a defamation case and sexual abuse cases.

Lawyer William Crosby argued that the decision to dismiss Bishop Anthony Pilla as a defendant in the defamation case was wrong because documents were withheld from Judge Janet Burnside of Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court.

Christopher Kodger and his parents, Suzan and Donald Kodger, have sued the diocese, accusing the diocese of falsely stating in 2002 that they supported the reassignment of the Rev. James Mulica. Christopher Kodger said the priest sexually abused him when he was a child.

Pilla on July 19 testified in a deposition that he twice reassigned Mulica. Pilla said the decision was made after Mulica had been treated for an alcohol problem at a treatment center for Catholic clergy.

In January, Burnside dismissed Pilla as a defendant on grounds that there was no evidence to support the family's claims against him. A motion filed Tuesday seeks to set aside that order and make Pilla a defendant again.

"The diocese believes that it is entirely inappropriate to try any type of legal case in the media. These matters should be properly confined to the courts where they belong," diocese spokesman Bob Tayek said Tuesday.

Crosby, who questioned Pilla last week during the bishop's deposition, filed a motion on Tuesday in which he said Pilla's lawyers withheld documents that "reveal that Bishop Pilla was the source of the defamatory material."

Some people who attended Mass on Tuesday at St. John Cathedral, the diocese's home church, expressed concerns about mounting criticism against the bishop.

"Obviously he's had too much empathy for his fellow priests, but he's still a kind and gentle man, and he's done a lot for the diocese," said Jerry Krayzel, a parishioner.

Sister Rose Mary Hoge, an Ursuline nun who also attended Mass, said it appears as if Pilla has been targeted in part because of his high-ranking position. She said she cried last week when she heard some of the allegations against him, including criticism from several women that the bishop has not adequately apologized as promised for a priest's abusive behavior at an all-girls high school about 40 years ago.

Crosby said there is no campaign against the bishop that he knows of.

"While it may seem like piling on, it really is a reaction to perceived arrogance," Crosby said.

A national sex abuse scandal that erupted in 2002 was sparked by revelations that many bishops moved guilty priests among parish assignments without warning parents or police.

___

On the Net:

Cleveland Diocese: http://www.dioceseofcleveland.org/

Copyright 2005 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

© 2005 cleveland.com All Rights Reserved.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: bishoppilla

1 posted on 07/26/2005 2:27:04 PM PDT by Knock3Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: letusprey; Diago

"Crosby said there is no campaign against the bishop that he knows of."

Crosby may want to check out his client's website which has launched a world class campaign against Bishop "Gay Flag" Pilla.

http://www.letusprey.org/

What follows is from the website of Mr. Crosby's client:

Dedicated to the eradication of organised child sexual abuse.


~

Anthony Pilla- RESIGN.

NOW.

~

Pilla's deposition has been taken. He admits to moving a known child rapist to elementary schools full of children. In direct opposition to the stated inaccurate position the diocese and he has always stated for the past twenty four years: namely, that there ever was only one allegation against mulica. He also has admitted that there were other victims of mulica. As I get


2 posted on 07/26/2005 2:33:01 PM PDT by Knock3Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knock3Times
Crosby...filed a motion on Tuesday in which he said Pilla's lawyers withheld documents that "reveal that Bishop Pilla was the source of the defamatory material."

Innarestin'. I hope Crosby's got copies of said documents or his credibility with the judge is going to be terrible. Wonder why he hasn't entered them into evidence himself?

3 posted on 07/26/2005 3:12:56 PM PDT by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson