Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer; netmilsmom; AnAmericanMother; Desdemona; Pyro7480; sockmonkey
During our wanderings I only found a few dioceses where this violation of intimacy takes place because of Diocesan direction, teaching, or encouragement. The worst was the Diocese of Galveston-Houston where it was actively promoted from the top down, and actively resisted by the three conservative/traditional parishes in Houston (OLWalsingham, H.Rosary, Annunciation). But the worst by far was the Diocese of Oakland, CA before Bp. Vigneron when weirdness and novelty of any stripe seemed de rigeur.

The real point is diocesesan promotion of this practice, and if a diocese is promoting it, they are violating rulings by the Holy See raised in Doubts/Questions posed to the Holy See by proper authority. I could speak about the Diocese of Metuchen from years gone by, but the words I would type would break forth into flame on your computer screen rendering it a total loss -- and I don't wish that on my friends.

But back to the matter at hand: Holding hands for the Paternoster is illicit. Period.

40 posted on 07/24/2005 9:30:25 PM PDT by Siobhan ("Whenever you come to save Rome, make all the noise you want." -- Pius XII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Siobhan

Here in St. Louis, the practice is not promoted, but being the land of the Jesuits, fads like this spread like wildfire.

Me? I follow the veiled sisters' example. They stand with their heads slightly bowed, their hands at their waists before them with their fingers laced. It's very moving and solemn to see.


47 posted on 07/25/2005 5:29:35 AM PDT by Desdemona (Music Librarian and provider of cucumber sandwiches, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary. Hats required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson