Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc

Lord of the Rings is better. I've read Harry Potter and it's easy to see why kids these days don't read books like The Hobbit, LOTR and C.S.Lewis.


6 posted on 07/13/2005 3:27:59 AM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cyborg; thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; DaveTesla; mercygrace; Laissez-faire capitalist; ...

Moral Absolutes Ping.

LOTR and the Narnia books uplift the mind and heart. The Harry Potter books are slimey, poorly written, crass, and appeal to lowly emotions and aspirations. They make evil and nastiness seem cool. I read two of them (am thinking eventually to possibly write a couple of books for older children, say 9 up) and wanted to see the author's style and presentation.

I was amazed that the books are so popular. They are two dimensional. There are different kinds of fantasy - that which uplifts, and gives a hint of the eternal, and that which degrades, and gives a hint of the subterranean. HP is the latter. And as the Pope said, makes the illicit seem attractive - kind of like a prostitute in the semi-dark, with a lot of makeup on.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.


80 posted on 07/13/2005 8:38:42 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cyborg

My nine year old reads Harry Potter. She is upstairs reading Fellowship of the Ring right now.


440 posted on 07/14/2005 8:34:15 AM PDT by Politicalmom (Just one more reason to hate the government....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson