Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54; Alamo-Girl; P-Marlowe; Buggman; blue-duncan; jude24

The entire point, TC, is that we ARE discussing the futurist perspective on this thread. The purpose of the thread is to make things have the BEST fit possible.

Help in that effort.

Then the models can be compared. You might personally find the "best" fit with the futurist model unfulfilling/unacceptable, but at least you'd know that you'd made a yeoman's effort to help arrive at the "best" explanation possible GIVEN that view.


826 posted on 07/13/2005 2:08:16 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; topcat54; Alamo-Girl; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; jude24
Thanks, xzins.

Topcat, we've basically reached the point of arguing in circles. At this point, I think it would be wise to take one of two courses: Either we participate in discussing and developing a futurist model rather than spending all of our time defending it piecemail, or you provide an article that presents your POV so that we can discuss it on its merits, and see if it stands up to Scripture as well as the views I and others of like mind have understood it here.

829 posted on 07/13/2005 3:07:57 PM PDT by Buggman (Baruch ata Adonai Elohanu, Mehlech ha Olam, asher nathan lanu et derech ha y’shua b’Mashiach Yeshua.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson