I am sure that "fatal flaw" has been adequately addressed to you dozens of times on dozens of threads. The evidence has been presented to you, but you simply refuse to consider the "evidence" and dismiss it because it does not jive with your pre-concieved notions of eschatology. The evidence has been presented, but you refuse to attach any weight at all to it. That is fine, but your assertion that there is no "evidence" is not true. There simply is no "evidence" that you will consider.
As for answering your point, I will leave it to Buggman as it is his thread. I am certain that if he hasn't already provided the evidence on this thread ( I suspect he has) that he will be more than happy to provide it and you will be more than willing to reject it.
In chess that is called a stalemate. In law it is called a hung jury. But then you are not the jury in this case. The lurkers are. You are free to espouse your theory and buggman is free to espouse his. And may everyone espouse their own theory in the spirit of Christian unity and may everyone be persuaded in his own mind.
I'm sure Buggman will appreciate your "constructive" criticism.
I love your astute, perceptive, accurate, understanding wisdom.
Indeed, it appears that the evidence was presented to you on post #204.
I hadn't noticed before because that post was directed only to you. But there it is. And did you consider it? No. You simply dismissed it in post 206 as if your caustic dismissal carries as much weight as Buggman's biblical evidence.
I pray that these threads which seek to explore God's revelations to man will show more Light than heat.