Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: D Rider; Buggman
The book of Revelation has about 400 verses, which contain over 800 references to the Old Testament. Thus it requires exhaustive study in the OT. If you are one of those that studies the New Testament only, you won't get it.

This is entirely correct. It seems to me, Mr. Buggman, that you have missed a very fundamental precept. In trying to explain prophecy you have neglected to study the prophets, and because of that, your book will never make sense to anyone.

106 posted on 06/22/2005 7:31:18 PM PDT by bluepistolero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: bluepistolero; Buggman; xzins; blue-duncan
It seems to me, Mr. Buggman, that you have missed a very fundamental precept. In trying to explain prophecy you have neglected to study the prophets, and because of that, your book will never make sense to anyone.


107 posted on 06/22/2005 7:52:27 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: bluepistolero; Buggman
"This is entirely correct. It seems to me, Mr. Buggman, that you have missed a very fundamental precept. In trying to explain prophecy you have neglected to study the prophets, and because of that, your book will never make sense to anyone"

That is very kind of you to point out what you perceive as his deficiencies. However, your generalization does not make sense to anyone without examples. If you had taken the time to study what Buggman has written, although you might not agree with him on everything he says, you would see that he has proposed an interpretation of the prophecies in Revelation that are as plausible as any post mil or amil theory out there.

The only real problem I see is that his charts don't have enough lines and arrows to be eschatologically obscure. But that will come with maturity as he grows out of youth work.
108 posted on 06/22/2005 8:02:38 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: bluepistolero

Given how little you've seen of my work so far (maybe 20 pages out of nearly five hundred), I'm curious as to how you came to this conclusion.


109 posted on 06/22/2005 8:17:48 PM PDT by Buggman (Baruch ata Adonai Elohanu, Mehlech ha Olam, asher nathan lanu et derech ha y’shua b’Mashiach Yeshua.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: bluepistolero
Amen.

"I have not spoken in secret, in a dark place of the earth: I said not unto the seed of Jacob, Seek ye me in vain: I the LORD speak righteousness, I declare things that are right." -- Isaiah 45:19

"Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing." -- John 18:20

134 posted on 06/23/2005 12:59:04 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: bluepistolero
"It seems to me, Mr. Buggman, that you have missed a very fundamental precept. In trying to explain prophecy you have neglected to study the prophets, and because of that, your book will never make sense to anyone."

With this single post, Mr. Pistolero Azul, you have assured that few here will ever take anything you post hereafter seriously.

What a remarkable accomplishment.

847 posted on 07/13/2005 8:38:20 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson