Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Pyro7480
You would be rebuking your Catholic ancestors too. They did the same thing. They only received once a year, even if they were in the state of grace.

They were wrong. And, it was the fault of clerics that so few laymen received the Eucharist. They were too "unworthy", they were told, to approach the Communion rail.

The saints you mention deserved sainthood if for no other reason than encouraging Catholics to receive Christ frequently.

59 posted on 06/02/2005 2:16:22 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur; Pyro7480; Rutles4Ever

It's not a question of worthiness or even of being in a state of grace. It's a question of being properly disposed. A person who has been provoked to anger, even involuntarily, is not properly disposed to receive.


64 posted on 06/02/2005 2:28:20 PM PDT by Romulus (Der Inn fließt in den Tiber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

You might remind some people that it was St. Pius X--surely no modernist-- who forced the abandonment of the
practice of infrequent communion,


91 posted on 06/02/2005 3:04:36 PM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson