Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ninenot
TA's explanation is not only cohesive, it's systemically consistent.

Some thought the same about TA's understanding of human conception. Alas, he turned out to be wrong.

Aquinas would no doubt disapprove of "Communion Services in the absence of a priest or deacon," but they are a reality and a necessity in today's Church.

121 posted on 06/02/2005 7:03:17 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

The particular citation was well within TA's area of competence--unlike embryonic biology, still a developing science.

TA would most likely approve of communion services in cases of necessity--like all men of the Church of Common Sense (that's the one we call Roman Catholic) TA never would allow the lesser to overcome the greater.

But "necessity" is rather elastic for priests who think they have a Job, not a Vocation.


124 posted on 06/02/2005 7:14:37 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

"Aquinas would no doubt disapprove of "Communion Services in the absence of a priest or deacon," but they are a reality and a necessity in today's Church."

Nonsense. We could just not do it.


125 posted on 06/02/2005 7:14:56 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson