Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: maryz

Good question. I did not author this document, nor can I claim responsibility for its distribution on 21 June 2004. I suspect this was sent to the Boston Globe to inform them of our situation and put the Archdiocese on notice that our situation has been made public. Interestingly, this never saw the light of day at the Globe. The Archdiocese neither acknowledged receipt or addressed any points.

I believe Archbishop O'Malley is troubled with very few of these details and only addresses strategic issues. Bishop Lennon is generally the point of contact, with which our Parish Council only met once, in August 2004, to address many of these issues. Nothing was answered...we are still waiting.


50 posted on 06/01/2005 3:47:47 PM PDT by Serviam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Serviam1; maryz
Thanks so much for that information. It seems that a great injustice is being done to the parishioners of Holy Trinity. It is unconscionable that you have not had a response from the bishop - and I tend to agree about Bishop Lennon. I wish Bishop O'Malley would clean house and start anew - and stop making the same mistakes that Cardinal Law made for all those years.

And it's a pity that Father Higgins isn't the full time administrator at Holy Trinity - I definitely sense Fr. O'Regan doesn't have Holy Trinity's best interests at heart.

51 posted on 06/01/2005 4:27:57 PM PDT by american colleen (Long live Benedict XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson