Posted on 05/20/2005 6:53:39 AM PDT by Mershon
The Legionaries of Christ: Fr. Maciel's Trial Draws Nearer The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has begun a preliminary investigation and has interviewed dozens of new witnesses – who have filled pages with new accusations
by Sandro Magister
ROMA, May 20, 2005 – Last April 2, just as John Paul II was dying in Rome, in New York the promoter of justice for the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Charles J. Scicluna, from Malta, was interviewing Paul Lennon, the former headmaster of a "School of Faith" run by the Legionaries of Christ. Mr. Lennon, who is Irish, is now a psychotherapist in Alexandria, Virginia, and a witness against one of the most revered and powerful men of the Catholic Church worldwide: Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado, 85, from Mexico, the founder of the Legionaries and the apple of pope Karol Wojtyla's eye.
With 650 priests, 2,500 students of theology, 1,000 consecrated laypeople, 30,000 active members in twenty nations, and dozens of high-level schools and universities – two of which are in Rome; one of pontifical right, inaugurated in 2002, the Regina Apostolorum; and another which has just been recognized by the Italian government, the European University of Rome – the Legionaries of Christ are a staggering success story.
Last November 30 (see photo), John Paul II publicly embraced their founder, Maciel, and congratulated him on his 60th anniversary of priestly ordination, in the jubilant atmosphere of a Vatican audience hall filled to bursting with thousands of Legionaries and militants of Regnum Christi, the order's parallel lay association.
Four days earlier, on the 26th, pope Wojtyla had given over to the "care and management" of the Legionaries nothing less than the Pontifical Institute Notre Dame of Jerusalem, a substantial meeting place and center of hospitality owned by the Holy See and located just a few steps away from the Holy Sepulchre.
But meanwhile, in another Vatican building, that of the former Holy Office, the then cardinal prefect Joseph Ratzinger had just told Scicluna, his promoter of justice, to pull from the congregation's shelves all of the trials still on the waiting list and in danger of never being processed. The order was: "Every case must take its proper course."
Among the folders was one six years old and marked, in Latin: "Absolutionis complicis. Arturo Jurado et alii – Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado." The first phrase describes the charge, the second gives the name of the first of the accusers, and the third is the name of the accused. The alleged crime, the absolution of an accomplice in confession, is one of the most terrible for the Church, so much so that it has no statute of limitations.
A few days later, on December 2, Martha Wegan, an Austrian living in Rome and working as a lawyer for the Holy See in the canonical forum, sent a letter asking Arturo Jurado, José Barba Martin, and Juan Vaca, three of Fr. Maciel's eight accusers, if they intended to confirm their request for a canonical investigation. They had submitted the request to the Vatican on October 17, 1998, delivering it by hand to the undersecretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith at the time, Gianfranco Girotti.
The three responded in the affirmative. Wegan communicated their reply to the promoter of justice, Scicluna. He opened the preliminary investigation on the denunciations in his possession: years and years of sexual abuse committed by Fr. Maciel against his accusers, all of them former Legionaries, when they were young and under his guidance at the seminary in Rome. The charge was made heavier by the accusation that he had then absolved them in confession.
* * *
The denunciations of the eight men appeared for the first time on February 23, 1997, in the Connecticut newspaper "The Hartford Courant," in an article by Jason Berry and Gerald Renner. At the time, the firestorm of reports in the United States of sexual abuse committed by priests on children and young people had still not broken out. But this was the forewarning.
What was striking, apart from the gravity of the accusations, was the personalities of the accusers: professionals, lawyers, accomplished university professors. Some of them had held high offices in Fr. Maciel's organization. One of them, Félix Alarcón, had opened the Legionaries' first outpost in the United States. Another, Vaca, had been president of the Legionaries in the U.S. from 1971 to 1976. In 1978 and again in 1989, he had sent two private declarations to John Paul II, accusing Maciel of having abused him when he was a teenager. In both cases, he received no reply. Partly for this reason, he and the other seven finally decided to make all of it public, and to submit their denunciation to the Vatican in 1998.
As a target of these defaming accusations, Fr. Maciel has always defended himself by denying them outright. But he has also counterattacked.
Against his accusers, he brings up the fact that at the beginning there was a ninth accuser together with the other eight, Miguel Diaz Rivera, a former Legionary who is now a professor in Oaxaca. He later retracted his accusation and stated that the others had induced him to make false charges.
Three other former Legionaries – Armando Arias Sanchez, Valente Velázquez, and Jorge Luis González Limón – are said to be ready to testify that they underwent pressure to maintain untrue accusations.
But the main argument that Fr. Maciel enlists is the result of a previous Vatican investigation against him, from which he emerged unscathed.
It was 1956, and eighteen accusations had been lodged against Maciel, including that of drug addiction. The Holy Office dismissed him from all of his duties, sent him away from Rome, and interviewed his followers one by one.
Among these were also the men who 42 years later would accuse Maciel of sexual abuse committed against them during that same period of the 1950's. But they said nothing of it then.
The investigation lasted until February of 1959, and ended with the absolution of the accused and his restoration to his duties. The Legionaries of Christ now exhibit two letters of full support for Fr. Maciel written by one of the inspectors at the time, Chilean bishop Cirilo Polidoro van Vlierberghe, now 96 years old.
* * *
In reality, not all the leaders of the Legion have always agreed about how to face the new trial that has been looming over Maciel since 1998. Some of them say that its failure to request the immediate processing of the trial has harmed the Legion rather than helped it. In the face of verbal accusations dealing with events that took place long ago, with no objective confirmation, and issued by a group of former members who are in their turn accused of "attacking Fr. Maciel in order to attack the Church and the pope," a verdict of absolution would have been certain.
But today this certainty is not as solid as it once was. Last January 23, at the chapter that meets every twelve years to nominate the director general of the Legionaries of Christ, the election did not go to Fr. Maciel, as it always had before, but to a much younger man, Álvaro Corcuera Martínez del Rio, 47, from Mexico. The general staff of the Legionaries denies that this event was connected with the trial. But the fact remains that since the trial was put into motion through Ratzinger's initiative, Maciel has no longer held any official post in the Legion he founded.
And the sequence of recent events seems to have turned against him. On March 25, Good Friday, in the meditations for the Stations of the Cross at the Coliseum, Ratzinger lamented "how much filth there is in the Church, and even among those who, in the priesthood, ought to belong entirely to [Christ]” and offered a glimpse of an energetic re-purification. During those same days, his promoter of justice, Scicluna, was leaving for America to investigate the accusations against Maciel. He arrived in New York on April 2, and interviewed not only Vaca, one of the eight who issued the canonical denunciation, but also another important former Legionary, Lennon, who confirmed the accusations of the former with his own testimony relating to more recent years. On the 4th Scicluna arrived in Mexico City, where he continued his interviews until April 10. He spent a total of twelve hours listening to the two formal issuers of the canonical denunciation, Jurado and Barba Martin. He also interviewed the rest of the eight, except for Fernando Pérez Olvera, who sent him a written account. But above all, he interviewed many new witnesses from Mexico, the United States, Ireland, and Spain, some of whom had been Legionaries until just a few years ago. They all added new accusations to the investigation, not only against Maciel, but also against younger leaders in the Legion, always for the same “filth.”
With Scicluna was a priest taking dictation. He kept a written transcript of each testimony, and at the end had this checked and approved by the witness. When the two returned to the Vatican in mid-April, they had on their agenda the names of twenty former Legionaries in Spain and Ireland who had asked to be interviewed. Scicluna might soon visit these two countries. In any case, he will as promoter of justice prepare a report with his concluding proposals at the end of his preliminary investigation. The Vatican authorities will decide on the basis of this whether or not to begin a real and proper canonical trial.
If it were up to cardinal secretary of state Angelo Sodano, a great protector of Maciel and the Legionaries of Christ, this trial would never take place. But Ratzinger has been elected pope, and he will have the last word.
Benedict XVI has elected as the new prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith the archbishop of San Francisco, William J. Levada, one of the four bishops in the United States responsible for the effort against sexual abuse committed by priests.
Two days before the conclave, on April 16, Ratzinger met Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, a great proponent of his election and an even more decisive supporter of a rigorous approach to purifying the Church of this scourge. Ratzinger assured him of his support.
As George was kissing the newly elected pope’s ring, Benedict XVI told him he would keep that promise.
__________
Please ping others who might be interested.
ping
Seems that the author tries to merge Father Maciel's case with the US sex abuse problems, all but saying Ratzinger was thinking of Maciel when he made his 'filth' comment, which serves as condemnation by association.
Something about "forest through the trees" comes to mind here.
Do you have any outrage of the possibility that this priest has been abusing young men in his seminary for years? That the Vatican has, to date, covered it up? That his order has a third vow that prohibits seminarians and priests from informing others (other than their "superiors") of anything "negative," or what they call "uncharitable" or "slander" or "detraction."
Does any of this outrage you at all? Why would DOZENS of Catholic men lie? Some of them are currently priests in good standing?
Nope. You look for the needle in the haystack. I will proceed with assisting friends and non-friends from keeping their boys and young men from being potentially molested.
I think you've pretty much got everybody.
BTTT
I agree. Fr Maciel doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Obviously the Vatican has been covering up his rampant sexual crimes. The evidence that Maciel cites as his defense (i.e. men pressured to make false accusations and previous Vatican investigations) should just be thrown out all together. I mean, anything that might contradict his detractors must be from Satan.
Nice try. It is not just Maciel. Read below. He is going to interview more than 20 others who requested to speak. There are others in the order now implicated. The article, at least if accurate, and Sandro Magister's sources are usually pristeen, show a systemic problem here.
I hope and pray the light is shone on truth. If these men had been smeared by person's in authority and by Maciel for all these years when they were deprived of their chastity and innocence, this is a crime FAR GREATER than if in fact every last one of them was lying. But then again, what would be their motivation?
Just like Marian apparition chasers after their apparitions are proved to be false, I hope the Legionaries and the RC members can recognize and realize the path to holiness is provided through the Church--not primarily through some movement, or some "branch" of the Church. I hope their Faith in the Church is solid because this could be quite a devastating time from within the glass bubble (inside the box).
"And the sequence of recent events seems to have turned against him. On March 25, Good Friday, in the meditations for the Stations of the Cross at the Coliseum, Ratzinger lamented "how much filth there is in the Church, and even among those who, in the priesthood, ought to belong entirely to [Christ]” and offered a glimpse of an energetic re-purification. During those same days, his promoter of justice, Scicluna, was leaving for America to investigate the accusations against Maciel. He arrived in New York on April 2, and interviewed not only Vaca, one of the eight who issued the canonical denunciation, but also another important former Legionary, Lennon, who confirmed the accusations of the former with his own testimony relating to more recent years. On the 4th Scicluna arrived in Mexico City, where he continued his interviews until April 10. He spent a total of twelve hours listening to the two formal issuers of the canonical denunciation, Jurado and Barba Martin. He also interviewed the rest of the eight, except for Fernando Pérez Olvera, who sent him a written account. But above all, he interviewed many new witnesses from Mexico, the United States, Ireland, and Spain, some of whom had been Legionaries until just a few years ago. They all added new accusations to the investigation, not only against Maciel, but also against younger leaders in the Legion, always for the same “filth.”
With Scicluna was a priest taking dictation. He kept a written transcript of each testimony, and at the end had this checked and approved by the witness. When the two returned to the Vatican in mid-April, they had on their agenda the names of twenty former Legionaries in Spain and Ireland who had asked to be interviewed. Scicluna might soon visit these two countries. In any case, he will as promoter of justice prepare a report with his concluding proposals at the end of his preliminary investigation. The Vatican authorities will decide on the basis of this whether or not to begin a real and proper canonical trial."
I save my outrage for those who have been proven guilty, not just accused. That's the whole point of completing investigations, to resolve the facts of the matter.
Or you could just join whatever lynch mob you see in progress.
So is that what is motivating you? Your opposition to the Legionaries?
Motivating me to do what?
Assume guilt until proven innocent. Or even deny the possibility of innocence.
The fact that a small number of his seminarians have accused him is no more sugnificant than an accusation in our courts. Is it possible that this group are telling the truth? Of course. Is it possible that they are not telling the truth? Of course. Where lies the burden of proof? Hopefully on the accusers even if ecclesiastical courts are not guided by Anglo-American notions of justice and procedure.
Is it possible that the Vatican has covered up? Certainly. Is it possible that the Vatican has not covered up but questioned the accusers and their personal reputations for credibility? Certainly. Where lies the burden of proof? Same as last question: hopefully upon the accusers.
Is it possible that the third vow which you have referenced was meant to cover up sexual misbehavior of Fr. Maciel (assuming but not conceding that there was any such misbahavior)? Yep. Is it possible that the third vow was an unfortunate formulation which seems to apply to sexual misbehavior situations but was meant to deal with other situations? Yep. Should that vow fall by the wayside and be dissolved in all cases simultaneously by the Holy See? Yep.
Should anyone ever believe the Hartford Courant in its decades-old ongoing campaign against the reputation of the Roman Catholic Church? Never.
Patience is in order. B-16 has apparently agreed to deal with the sexual misbehavior in the clergy crisis. He will and when he has there will be plenty of time for retribution against miscreants.
Meanwhile, the trial still comes before the levying, much less the carrying out of punishment. We have waited this long. We can wait a bit longer.
Why would dozens of Catholic men lie????? There is an infinity of reasons why they might lie whether they did or not. That a priest is a priest in good standing (including Fr. Maciel) is no guarantee of sinlessness. Same for psychotherapists. Each (and each of us) is descended from Adam and Eve who just HAD to mess with the Tree of Knowledge. JP II, B-16, Fr. Maciel, Fr. Maciel's accusers, you and I and everyone reading this post is affected by Original Sin. That is why they might lie but it does not guarantee that they did.
If a cleric were to be judged according to his clerical accomplishments alone, Fr. Maciel would be a adjudged a hero for Legionaries of Christ have been a spectacular success. Success or not, Fr. Maciel is also accountable for his personal behavior and his success ought not excuse bad behavior (if there has been bad behavior of the sort charged).
May God watch over the deliberations and provide those wo decide with the discernment and graces to act justly either way in accordance with facts reasonably found. Personally, I know several Legionaries priests and am inclined to be a skeptic as to these charges based upon their assurances but that means nothing other than that I hope the charges are not true.
I don't think I'll waste any more time on you.
It is about time that the truth is extracted and justice might finally prevail. The alleged victims have waited for far too long and I'm gratified to see the process moving forward.
"Ah, so I've read your posts and found out you're not Catholic and you have a particular opposition to the Legion."
I publicly proclaim the profession of Apostolic, Catholic and Roman Faith of Pope Paul VI, as well as the profession of Faith of the Council of Trent, as well as the Athanasian Creed, as well as the apostles' creed, as well as the Nicene-Constantinople Creed. I hereby acknowledge as a Catholic that I am a sinner and that I submit to the one true Faith of Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation. I acknowledge that I am a sinner in need of repentance, and that I periodically make errors in judgment. I publicly proclaim that I have a regular confessor and am an active member of my parish in good standing. If you have found anything heretical or schismatic in my posts, please point them out to me, and I will make whatever public retraction might be necessary.
However, if your accusation against me is baseless, then you have made rash judgment against me in a public forum, which of course is a grave sin. I have said nothing against your person, but merely have pointed out facts as they relate to the article as posted.
You have summarize well. I find nothing objectionable in the post as you presented.
However, you said: "If a cleric were to be judged according to his clerical accomplishments alone, Fr. Maciel would be a adjudged a hero for Legionaries of Christ have been a spectacular success."
I reply: In our capitalistic and American attitudes and mindsets, we often fall prey to this. God does not expect "success" from us measured in buildings, numbers and institutions. He expects fidelity in our daily walk in our state in life.
May the truth prevail--whatever it may be--I glory in none of this--depsite accusations by others to the contrary.
It appeared to me from your posts that you're in schism. Call your situation what you will; I don't really care how you split the hairs.
You clearly have an ax to grind against the Legion of Christ, and it shows.
"It appeared to me from your posts that you're in schism."
And this verifies to me that you once again made an allegation against me in a public forum (which is gravely sinful) and that you have no earthly idea of what schism even is.
As for the Legion, I posted the article. I did not write it. If you have a problem with it, take it up with Pope Benedict XVI and his promoters of justice, not me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.