Posted on 05/16/2005 7:55:07 AM PDT by thePilgrim
"Picketing Sin and Boycotting Moral Failure" by Steve Camp |
Several years ago, many in the media and in the church were in an uproar that Madonna had done it again going too far with her book release, SEX, and her companion album, EROTICA. The "Queen of Sensual Shock" had consumers talking, governments banning, educators clamoring, librarians shuffling and, yes, evangelical leaders boycotting. What Madonna had actually done, in an ingenuous sort of way, is to bring to light what our world around us is wrestling with everyday; mainly a self-absorbed, narcissistic, hedonistic belief system absent of moral restraint. Biblically, it is what Judges 17:6 so succinctly states "...every man is doing what is right in his own eyes". That statement sums up the "Oprah Winfrey School of Theology" impeccably. But something more profound was being communicated as well Madonna is more sold out to her sin, than many Christians are to their Lord. |
That's reductionistic thinking to the max. The gospel is conveying what Jesus Christ did for us on the cross, but we do that by both words & deeds. In other words, the gospel is also that Jesus embodied in giving himself away for others before He ever went to the cross.
In the book of Acts, those who cared for widows embodied the gospel. You can't get anyone more "pro-gospel" than the apostle Paul: "All they asked was that we should continue to remember the poor, the very thing I was eager to do." (Gal. 2:10)
So what? Do we "change the world's poor" by only "preaching the gospel to them & converting them to Christ?"
Hey, if MacArthur's angle or your angle doesn't cut mustard w/the apostle Paul, don't export it. The poor are not simply "a political cause"; the preborn are our neighbors, they're not simply a "political cause."
And don't hold the victims of political oppression, whether it's done by the govt or "only" allowed by the govt, as hostages to evangelism. In other words, we don't simply choose to "protect" the preborn by only proclaiming the gospel to abortion clinic workers.
The good Samaritan didn't just proclaim the gospel in words to the man in the ditch. He lived it. He risked himself to save the man in jeopardy.
I've also talked to a lay leader in MacArthur's church who flat out said Rahab was wrong to lie to protect the three Hebrew spies. We all know Rahab, the prostitute, not only lied but in essence was in cahoots with those engaging in espionage. I guess this lay leader thought James was wrong to commend Rahab in his book; or tha author of Hebrews to include Rahab in the Hall of Fame of faith.
I've also talked to a lay leader in MacArthur's church who flat out said Rahab was wrong to lie to protect the three Hebrew spies. We all know Rahab, the prostitute, not only lied but in essence was in cahoots with those engaging in espionage. I guess this lay leader thought James was wrong to commend Rahab in his book; or tha author of Hebrews to include Rahab in the Hall of Fame of faith.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.