To: malakhi
JPII obviously didn't have much luck with you. Maybe Benedict XVI will fare better. If I have to choose between either of them and St. Thomas Aquinas, I'm going with the Angelic Doctor.
82 posted on
05/16/2005 12:43:12 PM PDT by
Luddite Patent Counsel
("Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others." - Groucho Marx)
To: Luddite Patent Counsel
If I have to choose between either of them and St. Thomas Aquinas, I'm going with the Angelic Doctor... Let's see, 260+ Popes and almost 2000 years of Tradition vs. the misinterpretation of a Council that was not dogmatic. Someone around here may be a heretic, but it isn't me. I'm sorry, I was under the misapprehension that you were a Catholic. I see now that you are a Sosapixer or some other schismatic type.
86 posted on
05/16/2005 12:51:46 PM PDT by
malakhi
To: Luddite Patent Counsel; Bella_Bru; SJackson; malakhi
LPC: You would feign siding with St. Thomas Aquinas only because the Angelic Doctor never met SSPX and is now too long dead to definitively obliterate its schismatic pretensions and wiles and works and pomps. In actuality, John Paul II and Benedict XVI are popes. The Angelic Doctor unlike the fallen angelic schism would have had proper regard for these popes and proper disregard for the "Non Serviam" crowd and its justly excommunicated leaders.
89 posted on
05/16/2005 12:55:14 PM PDT by
BlackElk
(Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
To: Luddite Patent Counsel
If I have to choose between either of them and St. Thomas Aquinas, I'm going with the Angelic Doctor.
Am I to understand you are with the "Angelic Doctor" that heretics (including your broad definition) should be put to death?
108 posted on
05/16/2005 2:17:39 PM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson