Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: GrannyML

Regardless of whether you dislike this priest for doing the right thing, the public knowledge of Archbishop Levada's apostasy is well known. There is much more out there than one holy priest's account. As I mentioned above, St. Paul publicly rebuked Peter for much less. Fr. Heidt had nothing to gain and everything to lose (and did) when he defended the Faith to Levada. As Catholics, we are required to resist priests, bishops and even a Pope if they lead us away from Catholic teaching. Pope Pius IX said so as well as others.

We are not doing Levada any favors by giving false obedience to his error. He should have been demoted and reprimanded for his evil behavior. We should work for his conversion or containment.


42 posted on 05/14/2005 10:50:31 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Canticle_of_Deborah

You have provided zero proof of "apostasy" by Archbishop Levada. Even Hans Kung said that he would give Benedict XVI a 100 grace period before he began criticizing him. You can't even wait that long. Unbelievable.


48 posted on 05/14/2005 11:34:46 AM PDT by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
There is much more out there than one holy priest's account...

And I'm sure you'll ferret it out and post it here for all to see.

100 posted on 05/14/2005 4:31:35 PM PDT by american colleen (Long live Benedict XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson