[BlackElk]

Then, perforce, calumny would require "unjust damaging" but, of course, truth is not unjust and ought be required when the Church itself is assailed by the lies of her enemies who masquerade as Catholics when they are declared in schism and/or excommunicated.

Likewise, that other must have a good name but SSPX does not except in the imagination of its perpetrators and their gulls.

Likewise "a crime or fault of which he is not guilty" is inapplicable in that each and every excommunicatus and each and every schismatic are guilty as ruled by John Paul II in Ecclesia Dei.

You have rejected the promises of Christ for a spitoon of schismatic lies from your dead, excommunicated founder to his chosen partners in ecclesiastical crime. Time flies. Remember death.

[murphE]

You have rejected the promises of Christ for a spitoon of schismatic lies from your dead, excommunicated founder to his chosen partners in ecclesiastical crime. Time flies. Remember death.

Calumny - the unjust damaging of the good name of another by imputing to him a crime or fault of which he is not guilty.

I will no longer respond to you for I refuse to be an accessory by provocation.

gbcdoj, he's your buddy.