Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
I would add that all Henry did was install himself as head of the church; it was his son Edward (led around by the nose by his radical Protestant advisers) that made the real substantive changes to the church in England.

I would also note that it was Mary's high-handed actions (and more particularly her disastrous marriage to Philip II of Spain) that ensured that Elizabeth I had no choice but to restore the English church. Mary entered her reign with a tremendous reservoir of goodwill from the English people (not to mention a contrast with the bigoted and venal reign of Seymour, Edward's principal adviser), but she squandered it. If she had been more politic and discreet, England would probably still be Catholic today.

5 posted on 05/12/2005 9:35:56 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: C2ShiningC

Anglophile ping!


6 posted on 05/12/2005 9:56:36 AM PDT by GipperGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanMother
>>>>>>If she had been more politic and discreet, England would probably still be Catholic today.

You are exactly right.

7 posted on 05/12/2005 11:40:51 AM PDT by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson