Maybe so, but categorically it demonstrates that Tradition testifys to the inspiration of Scripture. Scripture can not be the sole rule of faith.
SD
I believe that my term is more specific and descriptive.
Maybe so, but categorically it demonstrates that Tradition testifys to the inspiration of Scripture. Scripture can not be the sole rule of faith.
Certainly it couldn't have been before it was compiled.
But some 1,700 years later ?
I certainly would vouch for the integrity and consistency of scripture over any church tradition of which I am aware.
Men tend to drift.
Scripture does not.