Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mother of the Son: The Case for Marian Devotion
Catholic Exchange ^ | May 11, 2005 | Mark Shea

Posted on 05/11/2005 10:04:08 AM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,201-1,211 next last
To: RnMomof7

"So although the plan of Salvation was ordained before the foundation of the earth God was not sure who the mother would be?"

I said God had foreknowledge of Mary's reply to the angel. How is that not knowing who the mother would be? This foreknowledge does not take away from Mary's free will.

Regards


321 posted on 05/12/2005 9:07:57 AM PDT by jo kus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

<<< Scripture tells us that Jesus was born without sin
Now Mary is born without sin>>>



All are excellent points.


Jesus Christ - accept no substitutes!


322 posted on 05/12/2005 9:09:37 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: annalex
"highly favoured" is a very bad translation of "kecharitomene", -- full of grace.

Actually the ONLY place it is translated as full of grace is in the Alexandrian text.

But I do say ask who gets the praise the giver of the gift or the recipient?

It is God that chose Mary as the human mother of Christ and it was God that prepared her for that role. She was nothing in herself without Gods grace. All the praise goes to God !

323 posted on 05/12/2005 9:11:32 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: jo kus

What if Mary had said no?


324 posted on 05/12/2005 9:12:01 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

"What if Mary had said no?"

That is sort of like asking me "when if God didn't create the universe"? It is a pointless speculation.

Regards


325 posted on 05/12/2005 9:13:29 AM PDT by jo kus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus; RnMomof7
Me (post 273):Mary was a sinless human. Jesus was God Incarnate.

These are two different things. Very different.

Rnmom:<<< Scripture tells us that Jesus was born without sin
Now Mary is born without sin>>>

************8

Petronius:All are excellent points.
Jesus Christ - accept no substitutes!

The both of you have proven my very point, outlined in the second part of my 273. There is a huge differnce between a sinless human and a Divine Being.

SD

326 posted on 05/12/2005 9:17:24 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; jo kus
What if Mary had said no?

Where was Mary asked a question?

327 posted on 05/12/2005 9:24:27 AM PDT by ksen ("He that knows nothing will believe anything." - Thomas Fuller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; RnMomof7

***Me (post 273):Mary was a sinless human. Jesus was God Incarnate.***


The Scriptures go out of their way to indicate that Jesus was totally without sin - they do so in several places. It's as if it need to be stated in bold letters that Jesus knew no sin.

There are no such Scriptures regarding Mary.



The attempt to present Mary as sinless is an attach on what the Scriptures indicate is a unique characteristic of Jesus.

Revelations is clear that Jesus alone is worthy - NO ONE else in all of heaven was found worthy to open the scroll.


328 posted on 05/12/2005 9:24:28 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk; eastsider

I'm curious, what are the "QOH", "HM" and "MOG"?


329 posted on 05/12/2005 9:26:40 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus; SoothingDave; RnMomof7
Revelations is clear that Jesus alone is worthy - NO ONE else in all of heaven was found worthy to open the scroll.

That is because Jesus IS GOD, of course no human being has that worthiness. However, as SD has pointed out, Christ's divinity is completely different from Mary's sinlessness. God protected Mary from the stain of sin, it was done through no effort of her own. Christ was sinless because he is God, sin is by definition a transgression against God; therefore it was never possible for Christ to sin, he didn't require any protection.

330 posted on 05/12/2005 9:32:13 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I just mentioned NIV because that comes in by default in Gospelcom.

Wycliff has "full of grace". King James went with "highly favored", and since that, all Protestant translations. Which is another good reason to avoid them. If you have a difficulty checking with the original, use Douay and when it comes to the books Luther banned, close your eyes.

who gets the praise

In Luke 1, Mary gets the praise. From Archangel Gabriel, no less. He said, "Chaire kecharitomene" -- Hail, full of grace.

331 posted on 05/12/2005 9:32:52 AM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
I'm curious, what are the "QOH", "HM" and "MOG"?

Queen of Heaven, Holy Mother, Mother of God.

Thanks for asking. I would never reduce any of God's names to an acronym so I Guess there is a subtle dig there against doctrines/persons that I don't find scriptural.

332 posted on 05/12/2005 9:35:28 AM PDT by biblewonk (Socialism isn't all bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
The attempt to present Mary as sinless

Fulness of grace means sinlessness, since where grace is, sin cannot be. Which is why, I just discovered, all Protestant translations obfuscate that verse.

333 posted on 05/12/2005 9:36:34 AM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; SoothingDave; RnMomof7
***That is because Jesus IS GOD, of course no human being has that worthiness.***



Well then if that's the case then isn't it rather dense of them to go looking for someone else. I mean, come on, what kind of a silly game would that be!?!?!


"...and I began to weep loudly because no one was found worthy to open the scroll or to look into it."
334 posted on 05/12/2005 9:37:18 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

I think that Paul never once or maybe only once even mentions Mary by name while unfolding the majority of Christiann doctrine.


335 posted on 05/12/2005 9:38:04 AM PDT by biblewonk (Socialism isn't all bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

James 1
21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls.

22 But be ye adoers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.

23 For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass:

24 For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was.

25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.

26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s religion is vain.

27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.


336 posted on 05/12/2005 9:39:17 AM PDT by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: annalex

*** Fulness of grace means sinlessness, since where grace is, sin cannot be***

The greek term behind "full of grace" is the same term used to describe Christians in the book of Ephesians.


337 posted on 05/12/2005 9:39:32 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk

I already pointed out what Paul had to say. What is your problem with that?


338 posted on 05/12/2005 9:40:57 AM PDT by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
I think that Paul never once or maybe only once even mentions Mary by name while unfolding the majority of Christiann doctrine.

Does Paul mention holding church services on Sundays?

339 posted on 05/12/2005 9:41:25 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk

Mary was NOT Heavenly Mother.


340 posted on 05/12/2005 9:42:01 AM PDT by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,201-1,211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson