Good point. Thanks. I've steered clear of reading these abuse stories in the past and have just taken everyone's word that the majority of them involved homosexual pederasts. Am I right in believed that that is still the case?
Yes, it is. When the media keep referring to "abuse of children," you have to remember how fluid a term "child" is to them. Remember all those "children" dying of gunshots? The vast majority of whom are 16-, 17-, 18-year-old drug dealers and gang members? They're doing the same thing here. (Sort of the opposite of what they did when women's lib took exception to the word "girl" -- I actually saw a newspaper reference to "the 13-year-old woman.")
Wasn't it the Cheshire Cat who said something like "A word means what I want it to mean"? His picture should be printed on press cards!