You're getting off topic. I suggest you consult my original post to see what I objected to, if you've forgotten.
the Patriotic Association has the characteristic of being in schism; which doesn't exactly say that they are in schism
Would you like to explain how an organization can have "the characteristic of being in schism" without being in schism?
No I'm not. To your objection, I made the point that the words of "the Vatican" that "the Patriotic Association has the characteristic of being in schism" are meaningless when it comes to the reality of what is going on, which I believe was Robert's point when he said, "Why do you have no shame in deliberately misleading FReepers and lurkers with information that doesn't reflect real time circumstances." Whoa..Deja Vu Anyway...
Would you like to explain how an organization can have "the characteristic of being in schism" without being in schism?
No, I would not attempt to explain something that I do not understand. Would you explain to me that if "the Vatican" meant "the Patriotic Association is in schism" why did "the Vatican" say "the Patriotic Association has the characteristic of being in schism."?