["Nothing in this Act contained shall be construed so as to compel a marriage officer who is a minister of religion or a person holding a responsible position in a religious denomination or organisation to solemnise a marriage which would not conform to the rites, formularies, tenets, doctrines or discipline of his religious denomination or organisation." One wonders if any such protections are being enacted here.--sionnsar]
1 posted on
05/06/2005 5:55:59 PM PDT by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; wagglebee; St. Johann Tetzel; AnalogReigns; GatorGirl; KateatRFM; Alkhin; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
05/06/2005 5:56:29 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
To: sionnsar
to practise sexual abstinence before and outside the marriage bondHow dare they be so judgmental and exclusionary of fornicators! After all, Jesus welcomed everbody, there is no core Christian doctrine on sex and we all should embrace pluriform truths! (Have I got the ECUSA talk down pat?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson