Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

Actually the Novus Ordo should be defined as "the optional Vernacular Rite of Paul VI" and the inaccurate term "Tridentine" should be recognized as the only "Latin Rite."


8 posted on 05/02/2005 12:45:21 PM PDT by Gerard.P (The lips of liberals drip with honey while their hands drip with blood--Bishop Williamson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Gerard.P
Actually the Novus Ordo should be defined as "the optional Vernacular Rite of Paul VI"

But it's not, is it?

Define it however you wish. There is no apparent clamoring for the wholesale return of the Tridentine Mass among even the world's bishops, to say nothing of priests and laymen.

How many bishops celebrate the Indult?

15 posted on 05/02/2005 12:59:50 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Gerard.P; sinkspur

"Actually the Novus Ordo should be defined as "the optional Vernacular Rite of Paul VI" and the inaccurate term "Tridentine" should be recognized as the only "Latin Rite.""


An interesting observation where Novus Ordo suddenly becomes the Latin Rite, thus devaluing the Traditional Mass, and which Anglicans happily use as an alternative to the Book of Common Prayer. No doubt this universality in practice is not lost on the new pope which will ensure its survival and be worthy of more tinkering to reflect papal quirkiness and evolving social expression. To suggest that the Traditional Mass can coexist with Novus Ordo is like comparing heaven with hell.


47 posted on 05/02/2005 5:12:04 PM PDT by Wessex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson