"His {Paul VI's} meddling in affairs while being suckered by Metropolitan Nikodim allowed the VC to re-arm for the Tet Offensive. Paul VI cost the U.S. that war."
I think we are done talking, if you actually believe that baloney. I don't know think I have never heard a more ridiculous statement.
Regards
First I suggest you untwist your double negatives.
Then, Just curious but why is it "baloney"?
Is that just a mindless knee-jerk reaction?