You're a sedevacantist?
What manifest heresy has Benedict XVI committed?
I looked back at your posts and you do acknowledge the pope. What am I missing? Is your text somehow supposed to contradict mine?
Naturally, a Pontiff who became a notorious heretic could not be Pope. One who does not belong to the Church cannot be the Head of the Church. But this is not detrimental to the inerrancy of the particular Roman Church, which I proved from Bellarmine and Vatican I.
Can an occupant of the Papal throne be a manifest heretic?
Is it possible?