Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Weapon of Mass Instruction
Audience One ^ | Steve Camp

Posted on 04/29/2005 7:10:47 AM PDT by thePilgrim

A Weapon of Mass Instruction
The Power and Authority of God's Word
“For this reason we also thank God without ceasing, because when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which also effectively works in you who believe” 1 Thess. 2:13.

The most effective weapon we possess as Christians for the work of the ministry is not pragmatic methodology, our TV shows, book clubs, music concerts, radio programs, our celebrities, famous pastors, or even our social alliances with other cultural moral entities--as effective as some of those things may be. The most effective weapon that any church or Christian possesses is the Word of God and the life lived in obedience to its claims. The church's responsibility before God as the "pillar and support of the truth" is to guard and proclaim the truths of Scripture. Consequently, the most severe crime against God is to mishandle His revelation, thus portraying a false, idolatrous image of Him to the world.

When our grip on the "sword of the Spirit" is loosened and our spiritual muscles have atrophied, the "once for all delivered to the saints faith" is hastily replaced by a saber of our own carnal invention. We cannot fight the good fight of faith with fleshly weaponry!

Measuring the Methods
There are five things that I use as a measuring rod when making a determination about the legitimacy of any ministry claiming to represent the Lord: the message, the motives, the methods, the messenger, and the money. In other words, does the message square with the Word of God; are the motives seemingly pure free from obvious false pretence; are the methods propitious and honorable; has the messenger demonstrated in the past and is currently exhibiting integrity of life and doctrine; and is money being touted as a prerequisite for ministry with an unnecessary emphasis in how it is being asked for or solicited?

The most difficult of these to evaluate is not the motives, but surprisingly the methods. Methods for most people are just the pragmatic means to get the message out more effectively to a broader audience. What could be wrong with that especially in our ever-changing pragmatic world? However, here is the problem; methods are not "a-moral." They mean something; more than that, they reveal something. A wrong use of methods--or a wrong emphasis on methods is what Charles Spurgeon fought against at the end of his life in what came to be known as the Down-Grade Controversy. He warned his Baptist brothers that using a worldly methodology would give entrance to a skewed theology and thus corrupt the gospel and the ministry. He was right.

We see this in our own day. For example, the Trinity Broadcast Network (TBN) carries on its programming schedule some orthodox teachers (i.e. Charles Stanley, Adrian Rogers, James Kennedy, etc.), and features also those who are unorthodox: the word/faith movement (Kenneth Copeland, Crefflo Dollar, etc.); or those who deny the Godhead--the Trinity (T.D. Jakes; Phillips, Craig and Dean); and/or those who "huckster the Word of God for profit" in order to generate more money for themselves (most everyone else on their programming schedule). The danger is, when you constantly publicize a mix of the genuine with the counterfeit it blurs the lines of sound doctrine and tends to anaesthetize the listener of discernment. Even those orthodox teachers, as mentioned above, end up unwittingly supporting the very thing they all oppose biblically. The listener enjoying the program most likely sends the lion-share of their support money not to the Bible teacher of the individual program, but to TBN. And if they have been "ministered to" by that program, they may even call TBN (per their toll free number) for spiritual counsel, prayer and direction. You forfeit on both counts: pragmatically--most of the "love gift" goes to the network; and spiritually--you have placed the members of your listening audience under the spiritual counsel of a phone operator. What would brother Spurgeon be saying about now?

The honest question has to be asked: can a unsound biblical vehicle like that one be spiritually profitable at all even if some of the time they get it right? Don't be fooled; it's not just another televsion network you can buy time on to promote your program. It is a well crafted "philosophy of ministry" with a very specific agenda that does not measure up with the Word of God. I agree with Dr. MacArthur when he has said on many occasions, "TBN has done more harm to the gospel than Jerry Springer. For a false representation of God is more damaging than a true display of sin." I fully agree with his insigthful words. Methodology matters; and just as important, the "who" you partner with in the work of the gospel as well.

The motives, the methods, the messengers, the money and the message. That is why Scripture must be treated with reverence and care because it is the self-revelation of God. It is from Scripture alone that we know who our Lord is and the fullness of His worth and works. We study God's Word to know our Lord. It is not so that we may have sermons to preach, songs to sing, testimonies to tell, but it is chiefly to know Him. And out of the depth of that knowing to make Him known.

Taking God Seriously
No one ever lives greater than their view of God and our view of God is determined, shaped, and formed by how He has revealed Himself through the pages of Scripture. (Cp. Psalm 50:16ff) Therefore, to fail to take God's Word seriously, whether by careless interpretation or by careless living, is to fail to take God Himself seriously. And if the church fails to take God seriously, why should the world?

Listen to these powerful words on the authority and veracity of God's Word:

"But as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel, even so we speak, not as pleasing men, but God who tests our hearts" (1 Thess. 2:4).

"Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold the traditions which you were taught, whether by word or our epistle" (2 Thess. 2:15).

"According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God which was committed to my trust" (1 Tim. 1:11).

"Fight the good fight of faith; take hold of the eternal life to which you were called, and you made the good confession in the presence of many witnesses. I charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who testified the good confession before Pontius Pilate, that you keep this commandment without spot, blameless until our Lord Jesus Christ's appearing" (1 Tim. 6:12-14).

"O Timothy! Guard what was committed to your trust, avoiding the profane and idle babblings and contradictions of what is falsely called knowledge" (1 Tim. 6:20).

"But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work" (2 Tim. 3:14-16).

"But has in due time manifested His word through preaching, which was committed to me according to the commandment of God our Savior" (Titus 1:3).
 

Read rest of article!


TOPICS: Apologetics; Charismatic Christian; Ecumenism; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: bible; scripture

1 posted on 04/29/2005 7:10:48 AM PDT by thePilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thePilgrim; xzins; Revelation 911; P-Marlowe; connectthedots
The most effective weapon that any church or Christian possesses is the Word of God and the life lived in obedience to its claims.

I don't think you'll find anyone here who would disagree with that statement. As I've said several times in the last few days, it's about balance.

The author talks a lot about "methods." Yet, he sure uses a lot of methods on his web site. Which would lead me to believe that he would agree it's a matter of balance.

That said, "Philips, Craig and Dean" deny the Godhead? Anybody got more info on that?

2 posted on 04/29/2005 7:52:18 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Objects in this tagline are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; xzins; Revelation 911; connectthedots
Interesting web site. It appears that the ministry that this article came from is a minstry dedicated not to proclaiming the gospel to the lost, but in criticizing those churches and organizations that proclaim the gospel to the lost in a manner in which this organization does not approve.

It is funny that they have several articles by Spurgeon condemning entertaining music and theatrical presentations and yet they themselves have a link to what they consider good music (i.e. music that entertaines THEM) and they have some sort of theatrical project in the works.

{!}

3 posted on 04/29/2005 8:36:21 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins; Revelation 911; connectthedots

"Physician, entertain thyself."


4 posted on 04/29/2005 8:38:14 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Objects in this tagline are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; P-Marlowe; xzins; Revelation 911

I find it somewhat ironic that some of the best articles to counter GRPL Calvinism come directly from web sites that the GRPL posts article from. The added advantage is the the GRPL can hardly then claim the web site source is anti-Calvinist.


5 posted on 04/29/2005 8:52:54 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Corin Stormhands; xzins; connectthedots
"It appears that the ministry that this article came from is a minstry dedicated not to proclaiming the gospel to the lost, but in criticizing those churches and organizations that proclaim the gospel to the lost in a manner in which this organization does not approve."

I suppose some told Jeremiah that he should stop complaining and go out and convert those heathen Canaanites to Judaism. Not everyone is meant to be a evangelist. Perhaps he's a teacher.

6 posted on 04/29/2005 9:26:59 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Perhaps he's a teacher.

Perhaps he's a busybody naysayer. I don't see that office in Eph 4:11. Must be in Eph 4:11.5

7 posted on 04/29/2005 9:46:51 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; P-Marlowe; Corin Stormhands; xzins; connectthedots
Perhaps he's a teacher.

Perhaps he's just judgmental.

8 posted on 04/29/2005 9:47:40 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Objects in this tagline are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; P-Marlowe
"Perhaps he's a busybody naysayer."

"Perhaps he's just judgmental."

In both cases they said the same about Jeremiah. I would not be so quick to dismiss his comments.

9 posted on 04/29/2005 10:04:59 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; P-Marlowe
I would not be so quick to dismiss his comments.

I didn't dismiss his comments.

10 posted on 04/29/2005 10:07:55 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Objects in this tagline are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; jude24; Corin Stormhands
In both cases they said the same about Jeremiah.

So now he's a prophet, huh?

11 posted on 04/29/2005 10:22:41 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
That said, "Philips, Craig and Dean" deny the Godhead?

It appears they used to be involved in a Oneness Pentacostal denomination, but their label now claims that they reject the modalist viewpoint - as best as I can find out based on a Google search.

12 posted on 04/29/2005 10:32:35 AM PDT by jude24 ("Stupid" isn't illegal - but it should be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

The most effective weapon that any church or Christian possesses is the Word of God and the life lived in obedience to its claims.

I find it amusing that this comes from someone of the Protestant ilk.


13 posted on 04/29/2005 11:02:44 AM PDT by Ambrose II (We cannot bend the Truth to our will, we must bend our will to the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ambrose II

Welcome to Free Republic.


14 posted on 04/29/2005 11:04:04 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Objects in this tagline are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Thank you -- I've been reading long enough, it was time for me to add my two cents!


15 posted on 04/29/2005 11:41:38 AM PDT by Ambrose II (We cannot bend the Truth to our will, we must bend our will to the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Q:I have heard a lot said about Phillips, Craig, and Dean and that what they believe about the trinity (according to their websites) is that only one of the God head (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) is active at any one point in time. Can you shed some light on this?
Bill

A: I'm actually surprised no one has ever asked this before. I'm also surprised that it is not talked about more in Christian music circles, since theology of God is an essential part of Christianity. Unless they have changed their beliefs in the past year or so, it is my understanding that Phillips Craig and Dean - three pastors (Randy Phillips, Sean Craig and Dan Dean) - belong to churches that teach Oneness Pentecostalism. Among other things, Oneness theology teaches an understanding of God that denies the Trinity, as orthodox Christianity has always understood it. Dan Dean has stated: "We believe in one God who is eternal in His existence, Triune in His manifestation, being both Father, Son and Holy Ghost AND that He is Sovereign and Absolute in His authority," and his church's website once said that "...there is One True God that has manifested Himself as Father in creation, Son in redemption and the Holy Spirit in emanation." Essentially, God will manifest himself in three different roles, but there are not three distinct persons. To learn more about Oneness theology you only have to do a simple search online.

http://www.cmcentral.com/ask/2782.html

From another site

Many popular Praise songs were composed by people involved with the Oneness Pentecostal movement which denies the Trinity and baptizes in the name of Jesus only.
Dottie Rambo: Behold the Lamb
Joel Hemphill: He’s Still Working on Me
Lanny Wolfe: Greater is He That Is In Me
Geron Davis: Holy Ground, In the Presence of Jehovah
Phillips, Craig, and Dean are oneness ministers
(The problem is not that the songs are necessarily unbiblical in every case, but that music is the bridge that is being used to cross doctrinal boundaries)


16 posted on 04/29/2005 11:58:39 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Thanks. I didn't know that about P,C&D


17 posted on 04/29/2005 5:25:24 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Objects in this tagline are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Did you ever hear something for the 1st time and then have several people tell you?

A few weeks ago my daughter in law mentioned it. Then I had three other people tell me .

I have no idea when it became public knowledge.

The "Behold the Lamb " one surprised me because I love it ..


18 posted on 04/29/2005 8:16:29 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

I love "Behold the Lamb" too. We used to use it in our Christmas show at church.

Did "Greater is He" musical (Lanny Wolfe) in college. Our tan tuxedos and brown patent leather shoes just ~may~ have been worse than the Oneness Pentecostal stuff.

I'd bet most people that sing this music don't have a clue.


19 posted on 05/01/2005 2:44:32 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Objects in this tagline are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

I think the point of the one site is worth considering , we can "miss" attempts to bring in heresy in the form of a song if we are not careful .

I think it calls for vigilance..


One other consideration is if they tithe any $$ we spend buying their music also supports their churches.

So I just think we need to be thoughtful and really listen to what the words are saying and try not to put money in their church baskets..


20 posted on 05/01/2005 8:12:15 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson