Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

O... and this is interesting:

the Patriarchy of Moscow was founded in 1589. The last Partiarch of that line was Adrian, who served until 1700. He was replaced by a coadjutor, and then simply a head of the Russian Holy Synod.

The Patriarchy was re-established by the Communist Party, to create a centralized, state-run church.

I therefore even wonder if the Catholic Church should regard the Patriarchy as a representative of the Russian church at all. Naturally, if you are trying to restore the unity of the ancient Church, you like to have a partner in negotiations. If Alexy refuses to talk, however, maybe Benedict should talk with other Archbishops. I'd love to see Alexy's reaction to frutful negotiations with Belarussians or Estonians. OTOH, I can readily see how they'd be unwelcoming to a "back-door" talks.


12 posted on 04/26/2005 12:55:48 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: dangus
The last Partiarch of that line was Adrian, who served until 1700. He was replaced by a coadjutor, and then simply a head of the Russian Holy Synod.

Peter the Great did not allow a new Patriarch to be chosen after Patriarch Adrian's death, and it was he who created the Synod of Bishops.

In 1917 the Synod of Bishops elected a new Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia. This was was Patriarch Tikhon.

Patriarch Tikhon was not affiliated with the Communist party except that he lived under their rule. He resisted them in every way possible and was arrested for this.

St. Tikhon Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia

122 posted on 04/26/2005 9:32:24 PM PDT by blinachka (Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson