Replies

Now, now. You know perfectly well that Father spent no parish money on personal expenses. No matter what you claim. The accountants have verified that.
Surely you know that Father has other sources of personal income from his publications and speaking engagements. He doesn't need to raid anyone's coffers to pay for his meals.
And you also know, since you were at THE meeting, that the money was used on remodeling, repairs and renovations of the parish grounds.
You also know that a parishoner was paid $27,000 for his part in the renovations and then lied about it on TV. "Ve don't know vere de money went." Really, I have a copy of the invoice right in front of me.
But that's not what this is about is it? You want him out, period. And at any cost.

Why don't you start answering some of the questions I have asked before regarding this situation. To date, you have not answered one of them.

How willing would YOU be to undergo an investigation of your involvement with the parish finances before Father's arrival?

Where are the records? Why where there no audits done? Why was a trust fund converted to a mutual fund and why are there no records of ANY of the financials available at the rectory? What were you people doing there? Who was running the parish? It certainly wasn't any of the "part-time" priests.

What if the World Herald reporter showed up on your doorstep and asked you the same questions?

You think that everything you have done is hidden, and everyone you have talked to is keeping your secrets?

Do you really think that your trusted confidants within the archdiocese are trustworthy?

Do you think that everyone you have made snide remarks to about Father to has forgotten that? Do you think that no one has kept count of all of the other incidents where you and your mob have tried to "get" Father?

Good grief, get a clue. Everyone at the parish knows who you are, what you are doing and why.
Your goofy little posts and quips just reinforce that fact.