Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: All
He notes: "Most Rectors in this situation usually and wisely do not front the action, but leave it to the Wardens to block a Bishop’s Visitation."

But the proposed extension of the disciplinary canons to the laity would then put the Wardens at risk.

I would not want to be a Warden under such a situation. If that extension occurs, some churches might suddenly find themselves without a full Vestry. I know our (non-ECUSA) Canons require all Vestry offices to be filled, but don't say anything about what happens if they are not.

4 posted on 04/12/2005 1:01:43 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: sionnsar

Not being well-versed in Canon Law, I can only speak anecdotally. Unless vacancies on the Vestry prevents a quorum in order to conduct business, the vacancies can continue without too much concern. If, however, it does prevent a quorum, the Bishop (ususally through a "Diocesan Visitor") can select a person & appoint them to the position. Where do they find these people to appoint, but who refused to stand for election? It's surprising how many will readily agree to serve on the Vestry if the Bishop gives them a personal invitation to do so. It's the same thankless job, but suddenly they see it as an honor because "The Bish" picked them especially. Vestries Beware! This appointee is always & forever indebted to The Bish & will be obedient to his will. If it comes down to what the parish wants or what The Bish wants, this person will always vote in favor of The Bish.


5 posted on 04/12/2005 11:29:34 PM PDT by torqemada ("Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson