Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

Well, that it's a bit disingenous for "reformers" to cite the early practice of the Church as an argument in favor of their wishes, isn't it?


47 posted on 04/07/2005 7:06:40 AM PDT by B Knotts (Ioannes Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
Well, that it's a bit disingenous for "reformers" to cite the early practice of the Church as an argument in favor of their wishes, isn't it?

In fact, the lack of observance of "continence" by married priests demonstrates that the early Church was either naive or just duplicitous about this practice. It appears that the Church had a policy, knew it was being ignored, and just looked the other way for 1100 years, occasionally reminding clerics that continence was still a requirement.

It was not until Gregory VII actually took the woman away that celibacy began to be observed.

53 posted on 04/07/2005 7:20:09 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson