Posted on 03/23/2005 12:34:45 PM PST by siunevada
Not true. Such odds would exist for a pristine sample, but most false results are due to contamination.
Real world: Stop the money and they will say, "why should we listen to you, who don't give us money?"
And no-one, even a liberal, likes to admit to himself that he can be bought.
I must admit that the Schiavo case has made me reconsider my stance on the Death Penalty as well. Maybe there could be a "Devil's Island" approach where the most notorious criminals would be sent to the middle of Alaska, where they could be no threat. No TV, no rec rooms. But yet there would still a chance for redress if there was a legal mistake. Once they're killed, there is no chance for that.
I'm not sure what you mean here. False results are producing exonerations?
Doesn't the prosecuting authority make the motion to dismiss charges in most states? I would think they would have to be convinced the evidence is beyond doubt.
Sure about that?
Catechism of the Catholic Church:
2267 Assuming that the guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor.
I'm not crazy about the government having the ultimate power over a person, however I wish these idiot bishops would do something we Catholics could actually respect. With abortions rampant, Terri Schiavo being legally forced to starve to death, and homosexuality running deep in their ranks, can't these guys find something better to do with their time?
Could not agree more with all you say. . .
Like the 'car analogy' also. . .works for me too.
Realize the DNA stats; but was thinking more of mistakes in the 'records or recording of; sharing data etc. . .when information is handled; mistakes are made; albeit much less opportunity with DNA info.
That said; I think the DP should never be eliminated; just saved for the extreme and heinous and horrible and unfair and unwarranted and whereby we know. . .beyond any doubt; that this person is guilty. . .ie the perp who murdered the Judge and 'others' in Atlanta. . .the perp who murdered little Jessica. . .
There are plenty of perps; who stand in Court without even the slightest justification; nor doubt offered. . .as to what went down and who is responsible.
We need to save the death penalty, for the best of them. . .
Zogby and the USCCB - just makes you tingly all over, doesn't it?
BTW, I saw His Eminence on CSPAN a few days ago. The faculty of Georgetown turned out to welcome His Majesty King Abdullah of Jordan. So, the good Cardinal gave the Invocation: he referred to God, to be sure, but in perfectly Unitarian terms, not once even implying that there are three Persons in the Godhead, I suppose thus being most welcome to His Majesty, a Muslim. But then, Georgetown was one of the schools whose academic 'qualifications' for Catholic education was most responsible for Ex corde ecclesia.
In Christ,
Deacon Paul+
Well it happens. . .but yes, the legal system is careful as well, in that they never assume a person's 'innocence'; rather make only the determinatin of guilty/not guilty. . .
. . .and 'The Exorcist' . . .
Ted Bundy is the poster boy. He escaped custody twice. And when he escaped the second time, innocent people died needlessly. His life revolved around killing and he was tough to keep in custody.
Thankfully. I'm glad that the Vatican has done this. I feel like it is a slap in the face to have this in the headlines now when Terri is starving to death.
Why aren't the American bishops launching a campaign to save Terri first?
This does not compute with me.
Secondly, I could not personally pull the switch, be in a firing squad, trip the blade on the guillotine, give the shot, or participate in it.
So I guess that makes me against the death penalty. If I cannot do it myself, it is wrong to condone others doing the dirty work imo.
I would rather the priority go to saving innocent life rather than those of convicted criminals if push came to shove.
There can be no absolute guarantees when the criminal is in prison; and no doubt; not a perfect night's sleep for potential victims; revisited. .
and of course, there is always the threat of 'mudslides. . .tsunami's. . .earthquakes; hurricanes. . .that just might require evacuation and opportunities for the more determined and desperate.
Better safe. . .than sorry. . .
What about the death peanlty that is being forced on Terri Schiavo???????????
The Church now teaches that 2,000 years of teaching regarding this issue were wrong. Interersting.
But doesn't it say in the bible that God decreed that the punishment for murder was death, because of the great value He places on human life?
Or, don't Catholics read the bible?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.