Everyone is free to do what he or she wants to do, with the understanding that our Creator wills us to do certain things and that there will be consequences for rebellion.
Now, the topic we are discussing is Baptism (Immersion) essential to salvation.
I don't want it thought that baptism shouldn't be done (it should) or that baptism by immersion is bad (it's not) but is it proper for members of a denomination that insists on immersion, to tell members of a denomination that does not, that they are not Christians?
If baptism by immersion is essential to salvation, then absolutely.
I, however, think such effort is worse than foolish in that it demeans Christ and will dissaude people from following Him in the spirit of truth that He wishes.
This means baptism by immersion is not essential to salvation.
Your opinions do not make something fact. So just because you believe that those who teach that baptism is essential for salvation are "worse than foolish" in doing so, that isn't proof that baptism isn't essential for salvation.
Please read post #145 and answer the 3 questions I posed in that post, if you don't mind.