[nmh]

"But there are also many other things which Jesus did which, if they were written every one, the world itself. I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written."

John 21:25

So is that an excuse to believe what ever anyone says who wasn't there and didn't know Him? How do you discern what is true and what is false? Or don't you?


We are talking about Joseph on this thread where there is hardly ANYTHING written about him. It's unwise to change the topic. Joesph for all intents and purposes is irrelevant. It is what is written about Christ in the Bible that should be the most important to you. It is HE Who has redeemed you; not Mary and certainly not Joseph.

[Campion]

Joesph for all intents and purposes is irrelevant.

Precious in the eyes of the Lord is the death of his saints, but nmh says that Joseph, whom Scripture attests to be a just man, is irrelevant. You'll pardon me if I think God's opinion matters more.

It is what is written about Christ in the Bible that should be the most important to you.

Are you saying that Joseph had nothing to do with Christ? Funny, it seems that Christ thought otherwise; Scripture says "He was subject to them."

It is HE Who has redeemed you; not Mary and certainly not Joseph

I believe we know that.

[A.A. Cunningham]

Given the option of believing you or the Church Fathers, I'll believe them. Your continued displayed ignorance of the history of Christendom is sad.

By the way, what Bible did Christ use?