[marshmallow]

Did you read the article?

He was not foisted on the Chapel by a mischievious bishop (more conspiracy theories). He was held in high standing by Fr. Perricone, who seems as shocked as anyone.

By the way, the little comment about the bishop's possible intentions is way out of line.

Imputing poor intentions on the bishop's part is presumptuous and sinful.

Another thread goes down the crapper.

[te lucis]

Another thread goes down the crapper.

One might wonder why the origingal poster called the story a "Tridentine/West Orange alert" when the story did not occur in West Orange, nor did it have anything to do with the "Tridentine" Mass...

One could be led to think that it was actually designed to go down the crapper, and to bring some FReepers with it.

[murphE]

He was held in high standing by Fr. Perricone

It is the opinion of many of those who had attended this chapel that Fr. Perricone himself was "foisted" on this chapel, just read any number of the previous threads.

Imputing poor intentions on the bishop's part is presumptuous and sinful.

Well, it's a good thing I made it clear I was speaking hypothetically.

more conspiracy theories

Can you believe it? How can anyone actually suspect conspiracy when all of our bishops are impeccable and beyond suspicion.