To: ahadams2; stan_sipple; SuzyQue; LifeofRiley; TheDean; pharmamom; Vicomte13; TaxRelief; Huber; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
03/13/2005 8:30:34 AM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
To: sionnsar
"Individual members of Anglican Communion churches do not have the luxury of deciding for themselves who they are in communion with."
You know, canonically, the author is probably right as far as any individual clerical or laity member of the CoA is concerned. This isn't to say that such persons cannot leave the CoA, but to the extent they remain members of the CoA, they are in communion with whomsoever their bishop is. If these priests "break communion" with their bishops, they become what we call "vagantes", a canonically irregular status, until they come under the omophorion of another canonical bishop.
4 posted on
03/13/2005 10:10:15 AM PST by
Kolokotronis
(Nuke the Cube!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson