Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Kolokotronis; altura

Kolokotronis, thank you for this. I've been pondering the "communion" definition question, and I suspect that among some "communion" is being confused, or blended, with "ecumenism."


43 posted on 03/13/2005 7:29:23 AM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: sionnsar; altura

"I've been pondering the "communion" definition question, and I suspect that among some "communion" is being confused, or blended, with "ecumenism.""

You know, I'd never thought of that, but you may well be right. There are those who say that ecumenism of necessity is a heresy. I don't share that opinion at all, by the way, but to the extent that ecumenical fellowship extends to syncretism, I can see how that would be a bad thing. In the sense that the term "communion" seems to be used by some Anglicans/Episcopalians, it probably is being seen as an exercise in ecumenism and thus is being used in a very different way from that in which I have been using the term. By the way, for Orthodoxy communion would be the result of ecumenical dialogue, not a tool to foster that dialogue.


44 posted on 03/13/2005 10:02:58 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Nuke the Cube!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson